You've used one incredibly basic metric comparing a handful of games to multiple seasons. It isn't a better sign. It isn't a sign. It is nothing.All we have to go on is a small sample size. Yes that doesn't tell us as much as if they had played more minutes together, but it's a far better sign than if they had poor production, no?
Do you have any objective measure that they were not good together? And "my eyes" and "the leafs coaching decisions" don't count.
I'm not going to make a statistical argument because I have some self-respect and do not want to be one of those people that make a serious attempt to cherry pick from such a pathetic sample size. I can probably quite easily find some numbers to suit my point, but they don't actually have any value in supporting it. It's just not an accurate objective measure in any sense. Doing so would just be a complete waste of time.
There's a reason the sample size was so small. You can disagree as to why that is & you can say that you saw different or whatever you want to do. I don't really care because at the end of the day Grabovski is gone because the organization saw things the same way I do. I just find it laughable that you would try to spout off an "objective measure" between Bozak and Grabovski with that sample size and expect to be taken seriously.