Why is it inconceivable for Matthews to be McDavid's equal?

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,514
6,241
Visit site
Saying Matthews had the better rookie season is like saying Kunitz had a better season than Crosby in 2011-12. Maybe he had more points than Crosby but we all know who the better player was.

Funny how the PPG vs. points argument falls on deaf ears when talking about the best player in the world.
 

Beerfish

Registered User
Apr 14, 2007
19,513
5,665
It's possible though not likely but the bigger question is how are the Leafs and Matthews going to do vs McDavid and the oilers? In the end its' who wins cups or more cups that is important.

I'm sure Matthews and most leaf fans would be more than happy to be 2nd or 3rd best and win cups.
 

Mc5RingsAndABeer

5-14-6-1
May 25, 2011
20,184
1,385
You really don't believe that a person can enjoy taking part in debates but not enjoy having to dig up the same proof over and over and over?

I guess it was too much to ask people to not be whiney babies and shout "SOURCE!" every time someone presents them with information they don't want to believe. Here, more spoon feeding for you so you can relax.



Now you can move on to point C instead of conceding the point and we can all get on with our lives.


I wasn't part of the original exchanges, but this transition stat is pointless.

It's saying that because he gets the most touches, he's the #1 transition forward in the game. That's poor logic. He gets the most touches partially because Buffalo has limited alternative options for breakouts.
 

Mattilaus

Registered User
Sep 12, 2014
7,798
6,511
Beyond the Wall
I wasn't part of the original exchanges, but this transition stat is pointless.

It's saying that because he gets the most touches, he's the #1 transition forward in the game. That's poor logic. He gets the most touches partially because Buffalo has limited alternative options for breakouts.

And there is point C, right on queue.
 

bucks_oil

Registered User
Aug 25, 2005
8,752
5,138
In general Leafs fans have not compared Matthews to McDavid and we realize McDavid is the better player. However just because a host TSN called Matthews a generational 1st overall pick along with McDavid should that really bother Oilers fans? It doesn't take away anything McDavid has accomplished.

It puts him on the same tier, which is just not (IMO and many PROFESSIONAL hockey minds, not media) an accurate statement.

Oilers fans become both intellectually & emotionally affronted by the suggestion. After 5 first overalls (all of which were, unfortunately, the consensus pick at the time) it is nice to have one that stands above all others. After years of suffering, that is ground worth defending from our perspective.
 

Samcanadian

Registered User
Dec 13, 2011
2,849
183
Matthews isn't even as good as Laine. AINEC.

In fact, you can't even SPELL Laine without AINE....C
 

FinnishSniper

Registered User
May 8, 2016
1,429
944
Finland
I could list 10 analysts who on several occasions referred to Matthews as generational. I'm not gonna bother though. I'll tell you this they have more credibility then all of you hfposters combined.

Matthews had a better rookie season than McDavid, best since Crosby. Maybe we should be comparing him to Crosby rather than McDavid because apparently there is no comparison to be made. Oilers fans are the worst.
So Laine had better PPG and GPG than Matthews. Does that make Laine generational as he scored more than the "generational" player? Hell no!
 

Hobble

Registered User
Sep 2, 2010
8,375
8,141
So now that Leafs fans have come to the premature conclusion that Matthews is better than Laine, they've now moved onto comparing him to McDavid.

Good.
 

FinnishSniper

Registered User
May 8, 2016
1,429
944
Finland
Even though Matthews is a better goal scorer, better along the boards, and bigger.
Does this make Laine better than McDavid, because Laine is better than McDavid in all of those categories. NO! Laine, Eichel and Matthews are in the Elite tier, but McDavid is in his own tier.
 

Tom Collins

Registered User
Aug 26, 2013
1,138
18
Why is it inconceivable for Matthews to NOT be in the same tier as McDavid to this very vocal (hopefully minority) sect of Leafs Nation?

What has he done to put himself there? Honest question.
 

McDavidCrushedLarkin

Registered User
Jun 12, 2016
4,320
2,413
Why is it inconceivable for Matthews to NOT be in the same tier as McDavid to this very vocal (hopefully minority) sect of Leafs Nation?

What has he done to put himself there? Honest question.

He got approximately half as many goals as Teemu Selanne in his rookie season.
 

Tyler Myers

Registered User
Feb 8, 2009
1,401
0
Sydney
Why is it inconceivable for Matthews to NOT be in the same tier as McDavid to this very vocal (hopefully minority) sect of Leafs Nation?

What has he done to put himself there? Honest question.

40 goals as a teen, also a mark that McDavid has not hit yet. Not saying hes better but you make it sound like its not even remotely close tier wise.

IMO it will be like OVIE and Crosby, numbers will say they are close but theres still a gap.
 

suddeninterest

Registered User
Aug 19, 2014
843
163
So if Matthews plays a full season next year and scores lets say 80 points will this debate be over for a while? Imo Matthews doesn't have the playmaking ability to match McD in points, but he will probably always be the better goal scorer. The speed at which McDavid can handle the puck is generational. McDavid had both more assists and more EV points than Matthews had total points this season.

Matthews has a suite of elite skills (and no weaknesses) that make him an elite player, but he has no individual skill that someone else in the league can't do as good or better.

McDavid has a suite of elite skills and a generational skill (skating/puck handling combo). No one else in the NHL can handle the puck at the speed with which McDavid can handle the puck, and that's what makes him "generational."
 

Tyler Myers

Registered User
Feb 8, 2009
1,401
0
Sydney
So if Matthews plays a full season next year and scores lets say 80 points will this debate be over for a while? Imo Matthews doesn't have the playmaking ability to match McD in points, but he will probably always be the better goal scorer. The speed at which McDavid can handle the puck is generational. McDavid had both more assists and more EV points than Matthews had total points this season.

Matthews has a suite of elite skills (and no weaknesses) that make him an elite player, but he has no individual skill that someone else in the league can't do as good or better.

McDavid has a suite of elite skills and a generational skill (skating/puck handling combo). No one else in the NHL can handle the puck at the speed with which McDavid can handle the puck, and that's what makes him "generational."


if matthews gets to play with nylander or marner for a full seasons i think it would be fair, Leon Draisaitl's development is kinda similar in a way to Nylander's. If youre just going by points though you would need to drop Hyman tho as hes an advanced stats offensive blackhole lol.
 

BlueBaron

Registered User
May 29, 2006
15,752
6,350
Sarnia, On
So Laine had better PPG and GPG than Matthews. Does that make Laine generational as he scored more than the "generational" player? Hell no!

The correct answer is it is entirely possible. Translate that into Oilernese "Laine is better than McDavid! "

Laine, Eichel and Matthews could all potentially rival McDavid. It's unlikely, but it is possible. Translate that to Oilernese "All three are the best player in the league and are all better than McDavid."

It took me awhile to get the language down but I've got it now.:naughty:
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad