Lucky7
Registered User
- Dec 26, 2008
- 670
- 4
Who is your pick for 1st overall in the 2025 NHL Draft, based on long-term potential? Which prospect do you see having the most impactful career down the line? Let’s hear your thoughts!
Really, I'd take Schaefer from a Flames POV simply because d-man take longer. If they enter a rebuild or retool better start with defenseman/goalie than forwards if you want them to peak together down the road.It sounds like there's not a clear gap between the top 4, so it would go by Team need. If I'm Flames management and I had the first overall I'm taking Hagens.
Having Misa in a tier above Hagens feels like projection/bias. If you think Schafer is a cut above everyone else then fine. If you want to have Martone in a lower tier than the other three because he is a winger then sure. But acting like there is a tier break between Misa and Hagens is unprincipled.Schaefer+Misa are in tier 1A for me and Hagens+Martone 1B. If I needed a center badly I'd go Misa but BPA and if needed a dman I'm going Schaefer 1st overall
Scheafer 1st, but it's not over. Hagens isn't far behind.
These two are clearly ahead of Misa, Martone or anyone else tho
Really, I'd take Schaefer from a Flames POV simply because d-man take longer. If they enter a rebuild or retool better start with defenseman/goalie than forwards if you want them to peak together down the road.
Broken collarbones are amongst the most consistent injury timelines. Bones are pretty straightforward compared to ligaments and there’s no #builtdifferent aspect to it.Top 6 centers are impossible to get unless you draft them. Hagens is the pick and now that he's starting to score some goals I think it will be the consensus at draft time. Shame about Schaefer's broken collarbone, I think it will be hard for him to be the consensus 1 as a result although the recovery time is not known yet I believe.
Watch more of his games and maybe you will understand all the hype around him. Schaefer is everything you want from a franchise defenseman. He controls the game both ways of the ice whenever he's there. Not taking anything away from Hagens cause i really love him too, but Schaefer is that good.When people claim Schaefer is a tier above the rest in terms of upside, I don’t really see what they mean. To me, his offense being the type to be hypothetically a Norris winner is questionable. This is a player who had 17 points last year. He didn’t score 1PPG at either tournament he played in for Canada last year. This year, the results are better, but enough to suggest a guy who can keep up with the elite point scorers in the NHL? 6 points in 5 at the Hlinka, 2 in 2 at the WJC, 22 in 17 in the OHL. And when I watch him I don’t see anywhere near the creativity with the puck or scoring skills of a Makar, Hughes, Fox, players like that. Maybe you hope he’s a Heiskanen or McAvoy level, but to me that seems like the absolute best scenario and we see that those guys have had trouble actually competing for the major awards. Obviously there’s far from a guarantee he even gets to their level. Maybe all you get is Jake Sanderson (a very good player), but not someone that looks like a 1OA level player.