Toggle sidebar

Who Will be Tanking for Gavin Mckenna in 2025 2026

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
Washed Up 29YearOld said:
mailin' it in for Gavin
Click to expand...

I looked at an online rhyming dictionary for words or phrases that rhyme with Gavin. Not really any good options that would make a cute catchphrase for tanking for him. On a side note I didn't like the phrase "fail for Nail" because "fail" doesn't actually rhyme with how you're supposed to pronounce his name I don't think. I could be wrong on that one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Washed Up 29YearOld
SheldonJPlankton said:
I could see an intentionall tank in the Habs near future.

One, it worked out OK for the Leafs when they tanked for Matthews.

Two, in order to build and populate a "Robidas Island" you need players with injuries and the Habs have had more than their share of injuries the last few years.
Click to expand...

Lol did you actually go back 10 years just to take a shot at the leafs? If you actually watched their games you would realize that the leafs did not intentionally tank that season.

They finished with 69 points, which is significantly higher than most of the last place teams that intentionally tanked.

Last place teams and the number of points they finished with:

15/16: Toronto 69
16/17: Colorado 48
17/18: Buffalo 62
18/19: Ottawa 64
19/20: Detroit 39
20/21: Buffalo 37
21/22: Seattle 60
22/23: Anaheim 58
23/24: San Jose 47
24/25: San Jose 47
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: SheldonJPlankton and Doubledose
2015 was a unique situation because being last place guaranteed Buffalo one of McDavid or Eichel. Despite how disappointed Tim Murray seemed, Eichel was perceived to be better than most 1st overall picks. In a worst case scenario, whoever finished last was guaranteed a franchise player that year.

Unless this upcoming draft has 3 legitimate 1st overall talents at the top, tanking won't matter much. You get the best odds at McKenna, but if you don't win the lottery, where does that leave you? Look at how much tanking set Buffalo back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
AvatarAang said:
Lol did you actually go back 10 years just to take a shot at the leafs? If you actually watched their games you would realize that the leafs did not intentionally tank that season.

They finished with 69 points, which is significantly higher than most of the last place teams that intentionally tanked.

Last place teams and the number of points they finished with:

15/16: Toronto 69
16/17: Colorado 48
17/18: Buffalo 62
18/19: Ottawa 64
19/20: Detroit 39
20/21: Buffalo 37
21/22: Seattle 60
22/23: Anaheim 58
23/24: San Jose 47
24/25: San Jose 47
Click to expand...
You have it backwards.

Truly bad teams finish with low point totals because they're undeniably bad teams.

Tanking teams finish just low enough in the standings to get the number one pick. Number two that season finished with 70 points. The Leafs finished with 69 points because there was no need to rid themselves of roster players to drop further in points.

I watched that season. I saw the Leafs pay to give away Kessel on day one for future picks and prospects. I saw them likewise dump Reimer, Phaneuf and multiple other roster players throughout that season...not for NHL-level players that would produce immediately...but for more future picks and prospects. The tank was undeniably evident and crystal clear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: karltonian and Summer Rose
Not sure how
AvatarAang said:
LOL thanks for the laugh, you must be the only person on earth that thinks Buffalo wasn’t tanking for McDavid
Click to expand...
Buffalo? I never mentioned Buffalo.

If you want to talk Buffalo...they were a bottom 10 team 2 years prior to the Mcdavid draft...a 52 point team the year prior to Mcdavid...and a 54 point team the year of the McDavid draft. If the argument is for a Buffalo tank then they sure went at it for at least two seasons and, most importantly, they sucked at it.

Why would any team emulate Buffalo even if they were tanking? The beauty of the Leaf tank is that it made them a mediocre team with additional yearly post-season revenue.

The Habs are a much more charactered and principled team than the Leafs. It stands to reason that if the Habs instituted a Leaf-like tank for a season, they would bounce back higher and more successfully than Toronto has.
 
Unfortunately not the Islanders as our goal every year is to try and make the 8th seed so our owners can make a few hundred extra grand in playoff revenue before we get knocked out in the 1st again
 
Sharks again, especially if they keep Georgiev / limit Askarov to 20-25 games. Hawks should improve 10 points because of Knight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom