Bad Company - No. They've been eligible for a couple of decades. The reason they're not in is because they were not all that special. They're only nominated to make old voters happy.
The Black Crowes - No. Nothing bad to say about them, but they feel like a second tier 90s rock act.
Mariah Carey - No. She's fully qualified to get in, but she should be punished for that Christmas song.
Chubby Checker - Hell no. Dude wrote one song.
Joe Cocker - No. His only real hit was a ballad he did for a movie soundtrack.
Billy Idol - Yes. He had a surprising number of hits, but I almost said no strictly because of Eyes without a Face.
Joy Division/New Order - Yes. This one is more about the influence than the fame, but I have to give it to them there.
Cyndi Lauper - No. Feels like she was more a bit than anything.
Maná - No. Never heard of... Him? Her? Them?
Oasis - No. And I say this specifically because I want to see the UK's reaction when they don't get in.
Outkast - Yes. One of the bigger hip hop acts with Hey Yeah being a massive crossover hit.
Phish - No. Can a band more known for an ice cream flavor than their music get in?
Soundgarden - Yes. They were huge.
The White Stripes - Not yet. They'll get in, but they can wait.
I agree with most of this.
Oasis obviously deserves to be in, regardless of how annoying they became both sonically and in person. It would be funny though.
Soundgarden were huge and yet they sold fewer albums in the US and worldwide than Bad Company.
I don't think Mariah Carey should be in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, but based on prior inductees, they probably can't leave her out.
The real challenge with bands like Bad Company and Supertramp is that their fanbase is starting to die off, so it's doubtful that there will be some resurgence in popularity. That and they just were never cool.
From a more personal standpoint, and as a bit of a musician myself, I don't have a lot of time for a band's image or alleged rock and roll authenticity.
I remember when people were falling in love with the Strokes because they were cute rock and roller types and celebrities went to their concerts. As for the music itself, it was nothing unique. They inspired a bunch of other bands like the Killers, the Arctic Monkeys and Franz Ferdinand who also probably won't age all that well either.
I don't care what they look like, I don't care what they wear. I don't always care what they sing about. I think that mixing your music to be low-fi on purpose is absurd and a cheat. If you're a stellar musician, I want to hear you.
I honestly think that some music critics spend more time worrying about who the band's inspirations are or what books they are reading, or what their backgrounds and childhoods were like, than actually listening to what is coming out of the speaker.
But if someone asks, just say “The Velvet Underground” and you’re set.