Speculation: - Who should be the Habs target for 2nd Center? | Page 25 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Speculation: Who should be the Habs target for 2nd Center?

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.

Who should be the Habs target for number 2 center?


  • Total voters
    285
I read that Kopitar would be interested to play with the Habs. Could be an interesting, short-term option.
 
The Bruins are apparently open to trading Zacha, whose deal expires in 1 year.

I know Montreal-Boston trades are rare, but I think Kent should call them to see what the price is. He's a Quartexx client and a former client of Kent, so you never know ;)

He's be a good stop gap for Hage and he can also play wing.
 
The Bruins are apparently open to trading Zacha, whose deal expires in 1 year.

I know Montreal-Boston trades are rare, but I think Kent should call them to see what the price is. He's a Quartexx client and a former client of Kent, so you never know ;)

He's be a good stop gap for Hage and he can also play wing.
Mtl-Boston trade are rare but possible so yes I agree with Zacha. Welcome to the board. I've been generous, I gave your 3rd like, lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rocket999
The Bruins are apparently open to trading Zacha, whose deal expires in 1 year.

I know Montreal-Boston trades are rare, but I think Kent should call them to see what the price is. He's a Quartexx client and a former client of Kent, so you never know ;)

He's be a good stop gap for Hage and he can also play wing.
I doubt B's are going to help us.
 
Players

  • Pettersson: High upside offensively, but risky (leadership and playoffs worries, recent drop). Question is whether a change of scenery fixes it.
  • Thomas: Producing well, but costly. Depends if St. Louis is actually rebuilding.
  • Hischier: Likely the most expensive. Strong two-way, low-risk, complete player.
  • Trocheck: Reliable all-around, brings physicality. Older—more of a short-term stopgap.
Key considerations
  • 2C profile: Go offensive (Pettersson) to complement Suzuki/Evans/Danault, or stay with a strong two-way model (Hischier)?
  • Risk tolerance: Pettersson likely cheaper, but riskier.
  • Hage evaluation and timeline: Trocheck fits as a short-term bridge if Hage becomes 2C soon.
If KH interested in Pettersson spells he's desperate
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad