He just recently retired.I read that Kopitar would be interested to play with the Habs. Could be an interesting, short-term option.
I'd be down with that.Moneyhands for me.
Respected teammate when he was here and should be affordable.
Maybe the change of coach is a good timing. Habs traded with that team last year. Would like Horvat.I'd be down with that.
Also would really like Horvat, but I doubt they let him go. Maybe? Since they're rebuilding now?

Mtl-Boston trade are rare but possible so yes I agree with Zacha. Welcome to the board. I've been generous, I gave your 3rd like, lol.The Bruins are apparently open to trading Zacha, whose deal expires in 1 year.
I know Montreal-Boston trades are rare, but I think Kent should call them to see what the price is. He's a Quartexx client and a former client of Kent, so you never know
He's be a good stop gap for Hage and he can also play wing.
I doubt B's are going to help us.The Bruins are apparently open to trading Zacha, whose deal expires in 1 year.
I know Montreal-Boston trades are rare, but I think Kent should call them to see what the price is. He's a Quartexx client and a former client of Kent, so you never know
He's be a good stop gap for Hage and he can also play wing.
If KH interested in Pettersson spells he's desperatePlayers
Key considerations
- Pettersson: High upside offensively, but risky (leadership and playoffs worries, recent drop). Question is whether a change of scenery fixes it.
- Thomas: Producing well, but costly. Depends if St. Louis is actually rebuilding.
- Hischier: Likely the most expensive. Strong two-way, low-risk, complete player.
- Trocheck: Reliable all-around, brings physicality. Older—more of a short-term stopgap.
- 2C profile: Go offensive (Pettersson) to complement Suzuki/Evans/Danault, or stay with a strong two-way model (Hischier)?
- Risk tolerance: Pettersson likely cheaper, but riskier.
- Hage evaluation and timeline: Trocheck fits as a short-term bridge if Hage becomes 2C soon.