Well, I haven't heard any issues about Chicago's ownership and San Jose's ownership like I've heard about the Sabre's ownership. That's going to hold Buffalo back.
Can someone explain to me why the general consensus is that the Sharks rebuild is so much further along than the Hawks? The difference in the public perception between the two teams is wild considering the Sharks have been every bit as bad as the Hawks the last 2 years.
I mean, if you want to say they have a better bunch of young forwards, then sure (though I think including Zetterlund in there is a bit of a stretch). But I am not sure if that group is so much better than the group of Bedard, Nazar, Slaggert, Reichel, Dach, Moore, Boisvert etc... that it makes up for the gulf of a difference on the back end. Considering defensemen take longer to develop, that has to be a real concern for San Jose going forward.I think they've been drafting better players. You can start to see a core of players coming together, at least at forward - Celebrini, Eklund, Smith, Zetterlund, Chernyshev, Musty, etc....
The only glaze is people like the draft picks/trades the Sharks have made more than Chicago.The San Jose glaze on hfboards is crazy. They suck. They have no defense. They are worse than Chicago but have been rebuilding for a longer period of time.
The answer here should be Buffalo. Chicago and San Jose have a long way to go.