Crease
Chief Justice of the HFNYR Court
- Jul 12, 2004
- 24,767
- 27,709
Park will be the next one, for sure.
Isn't Park still sour about being traded? I think he considers himself a Bruin first and foremost.
Park will be the next one, for sure.
Isn't Park still sour about being traded? I think he considers himself a Bruin first and foremost.
GirardiOK, you HAVE to retire exactly one player's number from after the 2005 lockout, in addition to Lundqvist.
Go.
Meh, the Habs have retired 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, and a half-dozen more. I think it’s cool that their players now have to wear weird numbers; It’s become part of their identity.It's absolutely ridiculous to retire so many classic numbers. From the numbers 1 to 11, 6 numbers are retired. An absolute farce and it has become more of a gimmick than it holding any value.
You almost start applauding the fact that we haven't won that many cups, because if so, there wouldn't be a single number left.
The darkest answer to this would be that the next two numbers retired are 30 and then 31. After 31 puts up a dozen great years here without a cup. Sorry for ruining your weekend with that thought.
In reality, someone probably goes up to the rafters before then. Park would probably have the best odds. Staal and Girardi would be dumb but I can see it happening. Wouldn’t mind Greschner. If Kreider plays out the rest of his contract here with a few more deep playoff runs, I can see that too.
Lundqvist. There is no one else on the radar unless the Rangers decide to recognize that they existed before the 1960s.
Lundqvist, and then after him someone that's not on the team right now.
As am I. Or even an Adam Fox. The ability he showed as a rookie is unreal.I think we all are hoping Kakko proves your statement untrue.
Meh, the Habs have retired 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, and a half-dozen more. I think it’s cool that their players now have to wear weird numbers; It’s become part of their identity.
Meh, the Habs have retired 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, and a half-dozen more. I think it’s cool that their players now have to wear weird numbers; It’s become part of their identity.
Re: #68 - Someone will have a better memory so correct me where I am wrong. In Jagr's last season as a Ranger, he had a clause in his contract that would have triggered another year or a team option for another year, if he hit certain scoring totals. Amazingly, Jagr went through a ridiculous slump. I can't remember how bad it was but I just remember it being inexplicably bad, and the option did not trigger. Jagr signed with a KHL team one day after the Rangers were eliminated from the PO's. Instead of taking what was believed to be a Ranger 1 year offer with a low base salary and incentives, Jagr went to Russia and earned the equivalent of $11M per season ($7M tax free in Russia) on a 2 yr deal with an option for a 3rd.
In Jagr's defense, I believe there was a second trigger for the option year based on PO scoring and he had a very good PO's.
Another thing I remember about that season is everyone knew the Rangers needed a secondary scorer and a defensive Dman. The Pens had the same needs and acquired Hossa and Hal Gill and won the Cup. Hossa put up 26 points in 20 games. Jagr put up 15 in 10.
It's absolutely ridiculous to retire so many classic numbers. From the numbers 1 to 11, 6 numbers are retired. An absolute farce and it has become more of a gimmick than it holding any value.
You almost start applauding the fact that we haven't won that many cups, because if so, there wouldn't be a single number left.
what about Nash. you know that would piss fans off. his banner can stare into your soul![]()