Toggle sidebar

Who else has very little interest in the Four Nations tournament?

I was going to watch this tournament anyways, but have to say my interest in it was moderate before this first game. Now I'll be watching it with much more interest after a great first game. Its good to see players get up and play hard when they put their nation's jersey on which makes it more exciting for the fans. :)
 
Cas said:
None of those players are on my team.

I don't think it's crazy to not care about players who aren't on the team you root for.
Click to expand...
I don't know if your view is different regarding say, the World Jrs. or the Olympics or even the World Championship, and my counterargument is a little bit muted because the 4 Nations is an NHL-organized event that should arguably be a 5 Nations tournament, but...

I personally will never understand the affinity people have for non-best-on-best, corporate league teams over international best-on-best tournaments.
Like yes, the Stanley Cup is the hardest trophy in sports to win, and it's a fantastic show of hockey but IMO it hardly ever rivals the World Jrs. or Olympic tournaments when NHL players are allowed to go.

Not wanting to see the likes of Crosby-McDavid-Makar all share the same ice on the same team against other countries' best players because your local team doesn't have a player selected is, to me, saying you don't like hockey, you like the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heksagon, hirawl, PWiz30 and 2 others
majormajor said:
I'm going to put a timer on for slightly after folks see Makar, McDavid, Crosby, and Mackinnon playing together for the first time, so I can watch them migrate from this thread to being obsessed with the tournament.

:popcorn:
Click to expand...

Yep, pretty much the whole thread.

CokenoPepsi said:
So much better then Olympic hockey...having Russia would be better but the Olympics is just boring
Click to expand...

C'mon. Canada 10-0 over Kazakhstan would be thrilling.
 
Nogatco Rd said:
This thread is going to be reminiscent of all the people who were too cool to watch the SC final last year then jumped on the bandwagon in time for game 6 and 7
Click to expand...

A SC final with 6 blowouts and a game 7 with 2 teams skating in exhausted mud should not be held up as an example for anything good or entertaining
 
1989 said:
I don't know if your view is different regarding say, the World Jrs. or the Olympics or even the World Championship, and my counterargument is a little bit muted because the 4 Nations is an NHL-organized event that should arguably be a 5 Nations tournament, but...

I personally will never understand the affinity people have for non-best-on-best, corporate league teams over international best-on-best tournaments.
Like yes, the Stanley Cup is the hardest trophy in sports to win, and it's a fantastic show of hockey but IMO it hardly ever rivals the World Jrs. or Olympic tournaments when NHL players are allowed to go.

Not wanting to see the likes of Crosby-McDavid-Makar all share the same ice on the same team against other countries' best players because your local team doesn't have a player selected is, to me, saying you don't like hockey, you like the NHL.
Click to expand...
I don't care about international hockey very much. I don't pay to go see Team USA multiple times a year, I pay to see the Sharks.

I don't care about the Olympics or World Baseball Classic or whatever else either. I don't root for players based on the fact that they happened to be born in the same geographical region I was and I don't care about Matthews or McDavid or Crosby except insofar as I need to when we play them. I'm not an NHL fan, I'm a Sharks fan.
 
SID THE MAN
Skärmbild 2025-02-13 064419.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: sanscosm, Avsfan1921 and Puckstopper
Cas said:
I don't care about international hockey very much. I don't pay to go see Team USA multiple times a year, I pay to see the Sharks.

I don't care about the Olympics or World Baseball Classic or whatever else either. I don't root for players based on the fact that they happened to be born in the same geographical region I was and I don't care about Matthews or McDavid or Crosby except insofar as I need to when we play them. I'm not an NHL fan, I'm a Sharks fan.
Click to expand...
But you root for players who are signed arbitrarily for business reasons mostly to participate in the sport you are a fan of in the local region as operated by the NHL. What's the difference in coincidences?

I think you missed the point of my reply - what is it about best-on-best you dislike, knowing that the Sharks aren't the best right now (and no offence to you, never have been)? And while I know you said you're a fan of the Sharks and not the NHL, would you/do you attend AHL games and lower development leagues to the same extent if the Sharks never existed? Are you automatically an NHL All-Star Game fan because of the required 1-player-per-team?

To me, and many others including the players, it's the literal pinnacle of the sport. Witnessing the best players of the generation show their combined abilities against others' top guys. What isn't there to like?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: heksagon and bossram
koyvoo said:
Lol at all the hockey genius’ who claimed it would be all star game level intensity.
Click to expand...
Yep. Bunch of people here out to lunch. Not seeing many mea culpas from the "gimmick all-star game intensity" crowd.

Pace in the first period and OT was crazy. Intense, physical, talent on display all night. Great, entertaining hockey.

But sure, the Debbie Downers didn't want to watch this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PWiz30 and 1989
I was stunned when people were saying it would have an all-star game intensity. That never happens when players suit up for their country.

Crosby pushed through an injury to be here and Doughty was begging for a spot. Which player has ever done that for an all-star game? :laugh:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom