Ziggy Stardust
Master Debater
People rarely if ever bring up any warts about Byfield and when they do it is treated as a massive insult. I went through the prospect threads for both Stutzle and Byfield a while back and I honestly don't know what every one is saying. Stutzle gets ripped apart by damn near everyone, while I rarely if ever see anything negative mentioned about Byfield. The only thing I see is people attacking strawmen like you are doing here, so maybe that is what every one is seeing when they talk about these critiques?
I mean, read the threads on here about who to pick 2nd overall. It is rude as shit the way people are treating Stutzle, yet I see people complain about the negativity regarding Byfield.
Go ahead and post the stuff being said about Stutzle that's considered rude and ripping him apart. The only major criticism I've seen about him is his shot and his willingness to shoot. Is that bad?
You must've missed the comments on Byfield's IQ by those who can't even offer up an explanation when confronted about it. Some poster brought up "attitude" in one of the Byfield discussions that I believe may have been taken down. Others repeatedly question his IQ when the contrary has been said about him. It's like those who question black quarterbacks and their IQ and how they rely more on their skill. No undertones there I guess...
I also learned from these supposed criticisms that a player who is able to generate offense going north to south is considered a negative ability. You can go ahead and post all of these negative things that's being said about Stutzle and let's see how they compare.