Rengorlex
Registered User
- Aug 25, 2021
- 4,775
- 8,636
I dunno if Ovechkin post 2010 has been a top 10 player at any point in time. His style is just min-maxxed for awards.
He's been overrated by some Hart finishes since 2010 but it's a better gauge than mindless pointing to a trophy count at least. But regardless the case for Ovechkin being a top ten player has to be based on his 2006-2010 period and then being elite (though not really one of the league's best players generally) for a long time outside of that period.I think his Hart trophy finishes are pretty representative of him as a player moreso than his Rocket finishes.
He's been overrated by some Hart finishes since 2010 but it's a better gauge than mindless pointing to a trophy count at least. But regardless the case for Ovechkin being a top ten player has to be based on his 2006-2010 period and then being elite (though not really one of the league's best players generally) for a long time outside of that period.I think his Hart trophy finishes are pretty representative of him as a player moreso than his Rocket finishes.
I think wherever you rank Lidstrom; Brodeur should be right there too
This speaks more on the anti defenseman bias amongst voters.At quick glance, it looks like Brodeur has 7 top 5 Hart finishes compared to just 1 for Lidstrom
It's pretty absurd that a player who was never a Hart finalist, or thought of as the league's best player during his career, is now finding his way onto top 10 lists
Ovechkin is the Kobe Bryant of hockey
It's not a bad comparison in terms of legacy. I don't blame Ovechkin for shooting when the units he played on were all designed for him to shoot, but in particular late career Ovechkin in particular does remind me of late career Bryant. I do think that Ovechkin has a better argument for top ten than does Bryant, though off the top of my head I'd keep Ovechkin out of the top ten.Ovechkin is the Kobe Bryant of hockey
He scored more than anyone else because he shot way, way more than anyone else, but his overall impact/value to his team over the majority of his career hasn't come close to a level that warrants consideration among the top 10 all-time
Does anybody consider Ovechkin to be a generational player?
He has just 1 Art Ross, and while he did lead the league points-per-game 3x, in 2 of those seasons he was only .01 points ahead. Crosby in '08, and then Malkin in '09
In 2010, Ovechkin set his career high in points-per-game with 1.51, which finished 1st in the league ahead of H, Sedin's mark of 1.37
Malkin, Kane, and Kucherov all lead the league by at least .20 during their career years, so shouldn't a generational/top 10 player be able to out-produce Henrik Sedin by more than .14 PPG?
Crosby has seasons where he lead the league by .31, .34, .23
Stop posting your off-topic diversion wall of text, @Neutrinos.
It took up four pages on (my) large screen (even spoilered), and it's continuing a diversion that's not super relevant. Multiple posters have reported it.
Give us something in two paragraphs or less, please, and then let's end the diversion.
Sorry about that...
It was my first time using it, and I just assumed the only thing visible would be the spoiler button itself
His Hart finishes post-2010 are a joke.I think his Hart trophy finishes are pretty representative of him as a player moreso than his Rocket finishes.
Same reason why Brodeur, Roy, and Plante shouldn't.Why shouldn't Hasek be in the top10? He dominated against skaters in maybe the most competitive era ever.
Didn't he do really well in the playoffs? His individual playoff numbers look extremely impressive. His team just wasn't very good. He also had an very long and successful career and even won cups eventually though not in his prime and carried his nation to an Olympic gold.Same reason why Brodeur, Roy, and Plante shouldn't.
Also, for being so "dominant", Hasek wasn't exactly Mr. Playoffs...
Yeah, that 1999 Sabres team doesn't make it to the Finals without him.Didn't he do really well in the playoffs? His individual playoff numbers look extremely impressive. His team just wasn't very good. He also had an very long and successful career and even won cups eventually when he was a bit older and carried his nation to an Olympic gold.
Top 50 NBA players from last 50 years: Kobe Bryant ranks No. 6 | FOX Sports
Nick Wright's countdown of the 50 greatest NBA players of the last 50 years continues, with the Black Mamba landing at No. 6.www.foxsports.com
Not the greatest comparison to try to make your point.
Your critique of OV post 2010 was reasonable, this post is not.
The 1999 Sabres make it to the finals without Hasek provided he is replaced by a good goaltender. That team outscored every other team in Eastern conference play on a per game basis in those playoffs and scored at least two goals every game while maintaining its defensive style. He was great but it's a myth that he carried the team by himself to the finals.Yeah, that 1999 Sabres team doesn't make it to the Finals without him.
I dunno if Ovechkin post 2010 has been a top 10 player at any point in time. His style is just min-maxxed for awards.
Averaging stats may be all right. But averaging stats don't win series.Didn't he do really well in the playoffs? His individual playoff numbers look extremely impressive. His team just wasn't very good. He also had an very long and successful career and even won cups eventually though not in his prime and carried his nation to an Olympic gold.
This will be the main argument for people when they decide that McDavid has passed Crosby on the all time list.If McDavid pulls off the crazy season he's in the midst of (60 goals/140 points/Hart) he ends up with that peak signature season we've all expected him to have.
Averaging stats may be all right. But averaging stats don't win series.
A good example as to why I hate wins and losses as goalie starts.Not like he can score the goals for them.
One of the 1st round losses he lost in 7 despite a .950/1.62 line.
Let's not act like Roy didn't benefit from playing behind prime Robinson, Chelios, Gainey, Carbonneau