[mod]Why are people putting Vancouver in this list? Everytime I go there it seems like the Canucks are an afterthought.
I think its ridiculous to claim any Canadian city besides Vancouver is more hockey mad than another. You're literally arguing about market sizes essentially. I'd put Edmonton first cause their fans stuck through one of the worst streaks of franchise failure in pro sports history but besides that they're all the same. Hockey is by far and away the #1 sport in Canada and its cities literally shut down during playoff runs.
I'm basing it on activity on TSN, Sportsnet, Leafs Nation, and other media outlets where Leaf activity dropped.
Look at Leaf home games, hardly the most ruckus of crowds even when the team is doing well.
They have passionate fans no doubt but they're not top 3 IMO.
Philly, Toronto, Nashville, and Montreal should be the top 4.
Philly is weird though. Comcast owns the team after their owner passed away. Philly is typically only on stations owned by Comcast and you can stream their games for free.
Pitt should not be on this list. I have never seen a local game blacked out for a playoff team in any sport and every game besides the Stanley cup game was blacked out for local stations in Pittsburgh. I guess the city is trying its hardest to milk the revenue from station deals/ticket revenue and stuff like that before pitt starts losing and they lose a lot of the fan base.
Montreal has always been a hot bed for hockey and it will continue even if they fall down to the bottom of the Atlantic.
Nashville is a new comer where hockey just looks fun to be in the stands for.
http://http://www.hockeydb.com/nhl-attendance/att_graph_season.php?lid=NHL1927&sid=2017
Attendance last year, even with Vancouver on a huge decline we still had better numbers than Edmonton. Try again to say the city isn't hockey crazed.
You're certainly not basing it on attendance. The team sold out nightly while being dead last in the NHL and had the league's highest ticket prices. Teams that don't register with fans as you stated don't do that.
And really, TSN and SN covered the Leafs more than any team even when they were 30th. So I'm not sure what you are using to base your opinion.
i keep reading these comments. although its true, what else would Edmontonians do during winter other than watch hockey or the grey cup?
places like Edmonton/Calgary/Winnipeg have good attendence is because quite frankly, nothing else to do in the city during the cold months
MTL/TOR/VAN there are more options...
i keep reading these comments. although its true, what else would Edmontonians do during winter other than watch hockey or the grey cup?
places like Edmonton/Calgary/Winnipeg have good attendence is because quite frankly, nothing else to do in the city during the cold months
MTL/TOR/VAN there are more options...
What are the other options in Toronto? Raptors?
Or Vancouver for that matter...during hokcey season they have the exact same amount of pro team playing as Edmonton, Calgary and Winnipeg
Canucks and Lions
MLS season ends 10/22..Canucks and Leafs are roughly 7/8 games into the season
Yeah I find it funny when people from Toronto/Montreal/Vancouver brag that there is more to do in the winter....
What exactly?
Calgary has the mountains, bars, clubs, restaurants, theaters and shopping just like they do? Sure they might have more options but in the winter you're still either staying home or going out to eat and drink, going shopping, going to a show/play/movie or going to play winter or indoor sports....
In the summer the bigger cities are more vibrant, sure, with more festivals and outdoor attractions, but in the winter during hockey season, that's not the case.
Considering it takes a lot of the people in say Northern Macomb & Oakland Counties, roughly 45 minutes to get to the arena (without traffic), sure there are always going to be empty seats to start a game during a weekday game.
Even when Toronto was scraping dog crap off its shoe, the numbers were still relatively robust. The leafs have been able to lock out any real competition from Southern Ontario as far as expansion goes. Most of the fans sit in the outskirts (larger population). It is the most underserved hockey market in the world. There is a lot of hockey being played from Hamilton to Oshawa to Barrie. All those fansThe city of Toronto always pays attention to the Leafs, regardless of how they're doing, but there is no fervor when the team is hopeless. The fervor is coming back, but it's not yet at the level it was in the 90's or early 00's, when the Leafs had semi contenders during the Sundin years. When the team is playing at the level of at least a conference finalist, the city is a fun place to be for a Leafs fan and also the Leafs players.
The city might be at that level again as soon as next playoffs, but if not next year, it'll be there soon. That's also around the time that local teens who chose to cheer for another team like Pittsburgh become Leafs fans, and act like they've been Leafs fans all along. Which is a good thing, considering that on some unconscious level, they always were.
The demographics of Toronto have changed. New immigrants or double income no kids. Many of the players come from the suburbs where more people like to raise families. Many do however go and play in the GTHA in Toronto if they are good (McDavid, Tavares et al)A few years back I crunched the numbers on players and cities, and I found that Edmonton produced the most 'current' NHL players and Thunder Bay produced the most players per capita. I went through each team and counted. So, I would have to disagree with the previous poster's last point as well (i.e. [Toronto] produces the most NHL players).
edit: I found the following on the bleacher report, about the 2011/12 season. It doesn't fully support my argument, but it does shed some light... yet, considering the differences in population, it seems Edmonton should come out ahead. Mind you, based on population, Thunder Bay is tops for producing NHL players.
Canadians currently represent 53.3 percent of all NHL players, which is a pretty incredible number. That’s over half the league. But which Canadian city has the most hometown heroes in the NHL?
Based on the 2011-12 rosters, we have a tie! The distinction is shared by both Toronto, Ontario and Edmonton, Alberta!
That’s right. Fifty-four players that are currently active on NHL teams come from either Toronto or Edmonton. This tie proves that a city’s population or resources does not dictate its hockey success; talent does. Edmonton only has a third of the population of Toronto, yet both cities have spurred 27 players to the NHL.
On my Thunder Bay point, I found the following that supports my findings: Pound for Pound, What is Canada's Best Hockey Town?
"Thunder Bay regularly churns out at least one NHL player (often more) for every 15,000 residents, a remarkable feat." By comparison, Edmonton produces 1 player per 45,000 or so, and Toronto 1 player per +100,000.