Which GM hire was most damaging for their team?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I don't disagree, but how are you so certain that Burke would have drafted Gibson/Rakell?

Ya, that question is valid. But that same question could be asked for any trade in history involving draft picks. And I did intentionally phrase it so as not to suggest Burke would have drafted those two.

But how about saying it this way. Burke and company identified Biggs as a target so much that they traded up for him. Biggs went on to play zero games in the NHL. Their evaluation was (obviously) wildly flawed.

Even if we assume they might have passed on the exact same player taken with the picks they moved, here's the number of games played by the next 5 players taken after each pick: Rakell's pick was followed by players who played 4, 99, 203, 519, and 221 games. Gibson was followed by players who played 9, 315, 506, 910, 335 and games.

Hundreds of games played by most of the options available with those picks. But they went out of their way to pay for one of the few guys who couldn't crack a lineup even once. The drafting under Burke was worse than abysmal.
 
Kevyn Adams has managed to add 5 years of missing the playoffs, to bring the streak to 15 years.

The posers mentioned itt need to bow their heads in the presence of true ineptitude.
 
Tim Murray created an all star lineup. Eichel Reinhart O'Reilly, Kane, Montour etc. He sold the farm sure; I would take him in a heartbeat to move Sabres assets.

Kevyn Adams for ineptitude is high on this list.
Murray didn’t trade for Montour. He also acquired a bunch of kids and guys who to say the least weren’t all there. That team was majorly toxic and that’s part of being a GM.
 
This is the most insane thread. Wow.

Especially EDM fans. Your team is 1st in the Pacific +30 goal differential. What the hell? You went to game 7 last year and you'll go deep again this year. There's no reason to panic.
I think it's the fact Edmonton probably would Have at least a cup if management was more competent or be even better set for the future. If the Oilers still had Holloway, Broberg, and Kesslering along with Savoie and O'Reilly in the pipelines, they'd constantly be getting youth value to complement their star players.

Except for Fletcher and Conroy (too soon), each of the 7 Flames GMs have done their best to monumentally destroy the team in their final stages with the organization.

Special mention goes to Button, Feaster, and Treliving. Utter buffoons. At least Sutter and Burke had somewhat of a vision
Unpopular opinion but I think Treliving still did more good than bad. Great at rfa contracts, most trades, and drafting. His flaw was definitely being awful in ufa contracts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose
I think it's the fact Edmonton probably would Have at least a cup if management was more competent or be even better set for the future. If the Oilers still had Holloway, Broberg, and Kesslering along with Savoie and O'Reilly in the pipelines, they'd constantly be getting youth value to complement their star players.
Your criticism spands past, present, and future GMs. As you can see with several teams, the best players don't always find their way to a Stanley Cup victory. I think EDM still has a window.
 
Last edited:
Except for Fletcher and Conroy (too soon), each of the 7 Flames GMs have done their best to monumentally destroy the team in their final stages with the organization.

Special mention goes to Button, Feaster, and Treliving. Utter buffoons. At least Sutter and Burke had somewhat of a vision
I refuse to have Craig Button on this list. Button created most of the lineup that Darryl Sutter took to the Stanley Cup final Game 7 in 2004.
 
The Oilers hat trick of Chiarelli, Holland, and now Stan Bowman has done immeasurable damage. They would have at least one Cup by now if the team was properly run, but here we are in Year 10 of Connor McDavid wondering if John Klingberg’s bionic hips and a goalie with a .902 save percentage are the solutions on defence and in goal. Just complete idiocy from a group of has beens every season.


took only 2 posts to name several oiler gms
 
For montreal, it probably unfair to lay this on the GM, because he might have been a puppet, and economics were bad at the time, but rejean houle saw tremendous damage from 95 to about 2000.

The hiring of Mario tremblay alienated some players including Roy, who they traded quickly after the incident. It almost felt like a panic move to get rid of the circus as soon as possible rather than trying to make a calculated deal.

The turgeon deal was a disaster too.

It was just a bad time. Their new arena was funded all with private money, and the dollar was sinking at the same time while salaries were skyrocketing. The habs were selling their main talents like recchi and damphousse for cheaper and younger talent.
You also didn’t like that trade? I hated every second Muller was on the Isles.
 
For montreal, it probably unfair to lay this on the GM, because he might have been a puppet, and economics were bad at the time, but rejean houle saw tremendous damage from 95 to about 2000.

The hiring of Mario tremblay alienated some players including Roy, who they traded quickly after the incident. It almost felt like a panic move to get rid of the circus as soon as possible rather than trying to make a calculated deal.

The turgeon deal was a disaster too.

It was just a bad time. Their new arena was funded all with private money, and the dollar was sinking at the same time while salaries were skyrocketing. The habs were selling their main talents like recchi and damphousse for cheaper and younger talent.
More like Houle set the Habs back like 15-20 years.
 
Ron Hextall has ruined both Pennsylvania franchises and I cannot do enough to thank him for it

I dont think there is a more mid GM than Hexy. Dude will never get another GM job which is saying something in a league that constantly recycles. I truly believe his goal is to draft forever, just squeak into the playoffs and constantly get picks between 15-20
 
I’m going to preemptively say that it was not Jim Benning.

As terrible as he was for the Canucks—I think a lot of his decision making was influenced by owner Francesco Aquilini interfering with hockey operations.

Either trying to rush the rebuild (Eriksson, Beagle, Sutter, OEL, etc) or not allowing the team to spend when they needed to (the disastrous post-bubble off-season, or the general lack in investment in hockey ops that led to them running out of time a lot).

That’s not to say that Benning wasn’t out of his element—but it is to say that things were made so much worse by ownership.

Generally for any other GM listed in this thread, I think ownership is an important consideration to evaluate their performance by.

I vividly remember, maybe %75 of the way thru Bennings tenure, someone on the Canucks board did the math.

Now albeit the salaries were starting to skyrocket and most tanking teams didnt spend to the absolute cap (we did every year of Benning except Covid)..

Even with his first year and his 48 wins...

He spent the most CASH, by a country mile (like close to double), to win about the 5th most games of all NHL clubs over his first 6 years.

The dude burned about 400-500 million dollars of Aquilini's cash to win one playoff round.

Most damaging to a team, probably not Benning.

Most damaging to an owners pocketbook, Benning by a country MILE.

And the OEL trade is still giving...
 
Yup. On a national broadcast a few years back Ray Ferraro said EJ came into the locker room shortly after getting the job and told them he was building a cup winner, "unfortunately he left out it was Pittsburgh!"

this was just just a stunning, franchise-destroying year

IMG_7864.jpeg

IMG_7865.jpeg


and cullen, zalapski, and brown were eddie johnston’s own guys from pittsburgh so it must have been an inside job

(the babych trade listed there is a mistake, it actually happened in the 80s. the actual babych transaction that summer was losing him in the expansion draft, and then minnesota flipping him to vancouver.)
 
He’s not the right answer but I just wanted to take a moment to bitch about Doug Risebrough. His desire to build a competitive, balanced roster from day one sent the Wild on the “stuck in the middle” path that they are still on a generation later.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad