ponder719
Abols to Abols, Dust to Dust
I'm not the right person to properly make the argument, but I really want the guy from the Flyers board who wholeheartedly believes the answer is Bobby Clarke to come here and lay out all the pieces. There's at least an interesting case that everything wrong with the Flyers today comes back to the decision to bring Clarke back as GM after Russ Farwell got fired (and more importantly to hire only people Clarkie approved of as GM, ever since), and that despite his own personal success over that time period, Clarke might be the best GM to do that level of damage to his team.
Of the more obvious answers for the Flyers, the question is what do you think does the most damage? A good plan, but poor talent evaluation and poor follow-through (Hextall), not much of a plan, but also not taking radical swings (Fletcher), or not really having the authority to overrule the dinosaur behind the bench and the meddling of the Foundational Titans (Brière)?
Overall, Milbury's the memetic answer, though there are good arguments for Chiarelli, Benning, anyone dumb enough to trade with Sam Pollock, and a few others.
Of the more obvious answers for the Flyers, the question is what do you think does the most damage? A good plan, but poor talent evaluation and poor follow-through (Hextall), not much of a plan, but also not taking radical swings (Fletcher), or not really having the authority to overrule the dinosaur behind the bench and the meddling of the Foundational Titans (Brière)?
Overall, Milbury's the memetic answer, though there are good arguments for Chiarelli, Benning, anyone dumb enough to trade with Sam Pollock, and a few others.