NyQuil
Big F$&*in Q
Europeans definitely have more of a hang-up on the nationalities of the referees in international games. And I think the reason is that soccer is the model sport for every country but Finland and Canada.
In soccer, it's unthinkable that a referee would be presiding over a game involving his home country. I mean, just imagine suggesting to an English soccer fan that the England-Italy Euro cup finals would be refereed by an Italian. You'd be laughed out of the room. And rightly so. But for some reason hockey is supposed so different that Canadian referees without any risk can judge an olympic final involving Canada.
This whole notion that Canadians are somehow magically exempt from bias is so stupid, but for some reason any suggestion of the contrary is dismissed like it's completely outragous. Like hockey isn't the one that's the extreme outlier in the world of sports.
Normally even a appearance of being partial is enough to call the integrity of a decision in question. But in international hockey, for some reason, they don't recognize that.
Humans propensity for national bias is proven beyond all doubt. This isn't exactly some groundbreaking new research. In the champions league, despite taking action to minimize bias by preventing referees from presiding over games involving teams from their countries, a study confirmed there was still national bias.
"We examine the existence and magnitude of own-nationality bias. Using playermatch level data from 12 seasons of the UEFA Champions League (UCL) and referee assignment policies that pair players and referees from the same country, we determine the bias that referees exhibit toward players from their native country. Players officiated by a referee from the same country receive a 10% increase in beneficial foul calls. Referees’ own-nationality bias is more pronounced for national team players, players at home, and in later stages of the tournament. Elite referees exhibit as much, or more, own-nationality bias as their less experienced counterparts"
http://econweb.umd.edu/~pope/soccer_paper.pdf
The phenomenon goes far beyond simply suspicion of officials from one of the countries involved in the game to officials from countries that have some perceived historical or cultural slight against your country.
I’ve heard Europeans argue that American refs are prone to favour Canada because of their close ties while the same people worry about a Finnish ref in a Swedish game because of their rivalry.
As if there’s no rivalry between Canada and the US.
There’s no rhyme or reason to it beyond finding some baseless explanation for why calls are being made against your team.
Ultimately, there’s no shortage of tinfoil hat reasons for a ref from any country to be in favour or against any other ice hockey nation.