WarriorofTime
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2010
- 30,472
- 19,110
thank you for admitting defeatI don’t agree at all, but that’s okay.
let’s see what happens tomorrow. I’m done with this topic for now
thank you for admitting defeatI don’t agree at all, but that’s okay.
let’s see what happens tomorrow. I’m done with this topic for now
Just not wasting more energy. Think I’ve said what I need to say and it’s all out there. I’ll save HF the bandwidth. I also don’t think anyone wins or loses. It’s just talking There’s a game tomorrow to focus onthank you for admitting defeat
You’ve been on hf since 2012 and this surprises you?Has there really been basically 2-3 pages arguing about a semantics point and the definition of rankings?
Take your place on the couch. It's what everyone knew, you managed to get out of one of if not the easiest groups in the tournament and are now easily dispatched by a half ways decent team from from europe, not a great team from Europe, a decent team.More like a therapy session for poor Canadians getting handed the harsh reality that winning qualification doesn't mean jack shit.
Yes. Let’s annex more UEFA teams to CONCACAF so qualifying can be harder. That’s exactly how it works.Pretty clear by now that all CONCACAF nations in their current form are complete trash. Who cares who is better when you battled it out with Haiti or Anguilla to get to the World Cup ?
We will take Canada more seriously when they are ranked in the top 40 in the world.USA just lost to an okay Dutch team struggling with a flu outbreak. Not sure they have much of a leg to blow smoke with either
But congrats on scoring a goal against Iran and Wales
I think you need a dictionary. Rankings are literally opinion based.
This is kind of a dumb post. We are talking about rankings not table. FIFA rankings are basically power rankings.The current NHL ranking is based on points or is it opinion based? Concerned parties want to know
I think they’re in that group of like teams 12-20 who could be argued there or argued out both with pretty valid arguments.Before this rightfully gets locked I am standing by that USA was not one of the 16 best teams in Qatar. See the haters in four years
This is a thread of who is better between Canada, the 41st ranked team and didn’t make the knockout stage, and the USA, the 16th ranked team and made the knockout stage.Before this rightfully gets locked I am standing by that USA was not one of the 16 best teams in Qatar. See the haters in four years
Sure. I don’t agree with it, but don’t think it’s unfair either.I think they’re in that group of like teams 12-20 who could be argued there or argued out both with pretty valid arguments.
Not rehashing this again for you.This is a thread of who is better between Canada, the 41st ranked team and didn’t make the knockout stage, and the USA, the 16th ranked team and made the knockout stage.
Seems like the answer is pretty straight forward. Canada has a long way to go.
Don’t need to rehash anything. You are stuck on arguing that the USA was not a top 16 team when this thread has nothing to do with that.Sure. I don’t agree with it, but don’t think it’s unfair either.
Not rehashing this again for you.
See you in four years
This is kind of a dumb post. We are talking about rankings not table. FIFA rankings are basically power rankings.
If that were the case Canada wouldn’t be ranked lower than the US. Canada is not a better team but had better results.