Where does Connor Hellebuyck now rank?

[Professor What]

There's been a lot of discussion about whether or not modern goaltending gets its due or if it lags behind previous eras, but I think there's probably agreement that the best of the best of recent years deserve credit for what they've done. Henrik Lundqvist, who I've got in my top 20 now, would be a prime example of someone that deserves that kind of recognition, and I think it's pretty well universally accepted that he does.

Of course, Lundqvist is retired now, so he's no longer among the ranks of the actives. Someone who is is Connor Hellebuyck. He just won his second Vezina tonight (which is one more than Lundqvist), and he's been a four-time Vezina finalist now (one short of Lundqvist), and one can only imagine that he's about to get his third all-star selection (one more than Lundqvist). All of this has been done by the age of 30. If he keeps this up, surely he's going to penetrate well into the top goalies list. My question is how far do you think he's gotten on the list right now?

Click to read more...

 

[buffalowing88]

Belfour is the immediate comp. I think that Winnipeg will falter in the next year or two and he'll be shipped to another contender. If he wins the Cup with them, he's a lock.

 

[Michael Farkas]

Definitely over Barrasso and company, which puts him top 30 according to our most recent list on goalies. And since Belfour was mentioned, definitely behind him.

 

[Professor What]

Belfour is the immediate comp. I think that Winnipeg will falter in the next year or two and he'll be shipped to another contender. If he wins the Cup with them, he's a lock.

How is Belfour the comp? Are you saying he's reached Belfour's level now or that's what he's tracking for? Because I think he's got some work on the longevity front to get close to Eddie.

 

[BigBadBruins7708]

the only one of his contemporaries that I'd take over him is Vasilevskiy

 

[jigglysquishy]

To me, there's five clear top post Brodeur goalies. Luongo, Lundqvist, Price, Vasilevsky, Hellebucyk.

I'd probably go in that order too.

 

[sensfan4lifee]

To me, there's five clear top post Brodeur goalies. Luongo, Lundqvist, Price, Vasilevsky, Hellebucyk.

I'd probably go in that order too.

Rinne was better than Helly

 

[Professor What]

To me, there's five clear top post Brodeur goalies. Luongo, Lundqvist, Price, Vasilevsky, Hellebucyk.

I'd probably go in that order too.

I'd scramble the order, but I agree with the five. I think they've all either entered or significantly moved up in the top 40 since the project was done.

I'd probably rank them Lundqvist, Luongo, Vasilevsky, Price, Hellebuyck, and Hellebuyck is quickly gaining on Price.

Rinne was better than Helly

Oof. I forgot about Rinne. I'd probably have him neck and neck with Hellebuyck. I like Hellebuyck's peak play better, but Rinne has the longevity.

 

[wetcoast]

I'd scramble the order, but I agree with the five. I think they've all either entered or significantly moved up in the top 40 since the project was done.

Sure that seems reasonable and I'll preference my comments with my usual "I'm less certain about my goalie views than for forwards and dmen"

I'd probably rank them Lundqvist, Luongo, Vasilevsky, Price, Hellebuyck, and Hellebuyck is quickly gaining on Price.

Maybe right now but Vasilsvky is gaining on Lou fast and Hellebuyck might pass Lou too the playoff situation in Winnipeg kind of hurts him though.

Oof. I forgot about Rinne. I'd probably have him neck and neck with Hellebuyck. I like Hellebuyck's peak play better, but Rinne has the longevity.

Rinne was in a similar team situation in that his team never got over that playoff hump.

 

[Crosby2010]

He needs some postseason success. Or else he ends up as Mike Liut.

 

[Professor What]

He needs some postseason success. Or else he ends up as Mike Liut.

Well, I think his regular seasons have seen him clear Liut, but that's not a bad playoff comp in my opinion. I think you can say that both of them contributed to some early exits.

 

[Crosby2010]

Well, I think his regular seasons have seen him clear Liut, but that's not a bad playoff comp in my opinion. I think you can say that both of them contributed to some early exits.

They did, yes. Liut has a Pearson though, that's a hard award to win especially in the Gretzky era. I don't see Hellebuyck in there at this moment. Goaltenders more than anyone are judged on postseason play. He needs some of that unless he has a career that totally makes up for it

 

[Michael Farkas]

Gretzky didn't win that many of those goofy awards, did he?

 

[Jets4Life]

Connor Hellebuyck:

-just tied record for least amount of games to achieve 15 wins (17 games)
-now ranks #47 in all time goalie wins
-now ranks #6 in active goalie wins
-easily leading all NHL goalies in virtually every category
-290 wins in 9 seasons. (averages over 32 wins/season)
-on pace to hit 500 wins by the 2030-31 season
-only 30 years old, never injured.

 

[Jets4Life]

They did, yes. Liut has a Pearson though, that's a hard award to win especially in the Gretzky era. I don't see Hellebuyck in there at this moment. Goaltenders more than anyone are judged on postseason play. He needs some of that unless he has a career that totally makes up for it

Give me a break. Even in the year Liut won a Pearson, he was not that great. 33 wins and a 0.894% was good for 1981, but by no means spectular. IN fact Rick heinz, a backup goalie had 0.922, and Liut was not the leader in any category (Wins, saving percentage, GAA, etc).

Liut was a good goalie, but nowhere remotely close to Hellebuyck. If one were to compile a list of the top 10 NHL goalies of the 80s, Liut would barely make the cut. Hellebuyck, OTOH, would be in the top 3, since 2014.

 

[The Panther]

Connor Hellebuyck:

-just tied record for least amount of games to achieve 15 wins (17 games)
-now ranks #47 in all time goalie wins
-easily leading all NHL goalies in virtually every category
-on pace to hit 500 wins by the 2030-31 season
-only 30 years old, never injured.

In fairness, none of these "things" are very impressive things. The first one is a hot team, the second isn't that great, the third is again a hot starting team, the fourth is just speculation and not fact, and the fifth is good but nothing about on-ice play. (By the way, I think Hellebuyck is the best goalie in the business and I've thought that way for a while.)

-now ranks #6 in active goalie wins
-290 wins in 9 seasons. (averages over 32 wins/season)

Now, these 2 are very impressive! For any goalie to win 30 games in a season is difficult, so to average 32 per season (assuming you're correct about that) is really great. (Of course, "wins" shouldn't be considered in a vacuum, as you also should measure them against losses.)

Give me a break. Even in the year Liut won a Pearson, he was not that great. 33 wins and a 0.894% was good for 1981, but by no means spectular. IN fact Rick heinz, a backup goalie had 0.922, and Liut was not the leader in any category (Wins, saving percentage, GAA, etc).

You and I tend to agree on this. Rarely has a player (not just a goalie) been inflated by undeserved reputation as much as Mike Liut during 1980-81. What happened that season? The Blues scored 1 more goal per game than the season prior. Liut's stats were exactly the same. But Liut inexplicably got all the credit.

Liut was a good goalie, but nowhere remotely close to Hellebuyck. If one were to compile a list of the top 10 NHL goalies of the 80s, Liut would barely make the cut. Hellebuyck, OTOH, would be in the top 3, since 2014.

I agree that Hellebuyck is above Liut handily by now, BUT I think you're well off in saying that Liut would barely make the top-10 of the 1980s. Whether we agree with it or not, he did win the Pearson, he was selected to start for Team Canada at the Canada Cup, and he won 65 games in back-to-back seasons (without overtimes). He had 4 or 5 fairly elite seasons between 1979-80 and 1989-90, so I'm pretty sure he'd be in the top 10 of that decade.

 

[Bear of Bad News]

Give me a break. Even in the year Liut won a Pearson, he was not that great. 33 wins and a 0.894% was good for 1981, but by no means spectular. IN fact Rick heinz, a backup goalie had 0.922, and Liut was not the leader in any category (Wins, saving percentage, GAA, etc).

Curious why you chose Rick Heinz (who played four games) as Liut’s backup, and not Ed Staniowski, who played nineteen games at 0.871?

It just seems like an odd choice unless you’re trying to distort things.

 

[yazmybaby]

It is very difficult to compare athletes in any sports during different time periods.
So many changes between eras to consider like the equipment used, speed of the shots, calibre of play, rules.