101st_fan
I taught Yoda
Two games without Pärssinen to start the season, none of the players in question were on the ice for more than one ES goal against (players not in the discussion were out there for multiple ES goals against when we pulled the goalie). Then the SEA game where things went off the rails. Then the next three games were at most four ES goals against across the entire roster (Stammer, Sissons, Smith, Josi ... March, Forsberg, McCarron, Tomasino with 3)Except that Sissons, McCarron, and Smith had all been bad leading up to the Kraken game as well. I don’t get how the conclusion from the first few games of the season should somehow be that Parsinnen was the cause of our fourth line bleeding goals. He certainly didn’t help in the short chance he got but the other guys were bad over much larger sample sizes. Which drives home my point they get a much longer leash to prove themselves than the likes of Parsinnen.
Looking at the 4th line combos for the season ....
17/47/36 - 5on5 on ice 1 ga, 0 gf
90/47/36 - 5on5 on ice 1ga, 0gf
26/47/36 - 5on5 on ice 1ga, 0gf
10/47/36 - 5on5 on ice 1ga, 0gf
68/47/36 - 5on5 on ice 1 ga, 2gf
13/47/36 - 5on5 on ice 1 ga, 0gf (16 seconds together)
13/47/10 - 5on5 on ice 3ga, 1 gf (4:30 together)
Only one player started their season with such a painful number of goals against in only a handful of shifts. Sucks for the guy who changed his number to 13 ... but he's had the bad luck of that number and he is now shuffled even further down with how L'Heureux is performing.