What's the max you'd give to Evans?

Please vote on 1 option for term and AAV


  • Total voters
    168

Bacchus1

Fill the net!
Sep 10, 2007
3,240
1,261
Montreal
I think ball is in his court. If he wants to re-sign, it should be team friendly. If he wants to maximize, he will go elsewhere. I think he wants to stay here, and I hope he doesn’t push for too much. I understand that ppl can make more money elsewhere. If he wants more money, he should go elsewhere.

This thread demonstrates what is wrong with the NHL. How can Canadian teams compete when our economy is more socialist that the United Statians?
 

SpeedyPotato

Registered User
Mar 29, 2012
2,655
2,577
I’ll defer to management on this one, they’ve shown a that they won’t get caught up in nostalgia or emotions, if they decide to sign him I’ll believe it’s because he fits in the plans, if they don’t that’s ok too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

HabbyGuy

Registered User
Apr 10, 2003
8,484
14,289
Hamilton Ontario
Visit site
I'd go 5 years, but yeah, he's not a $4m player.

$3.5m sounds right for him.

He's an extremely useful asset and that term and cap both seem fair, but how can we answer without knowing what kind of return we can get for him through a trade? He keeps this up, he's going to be quite coveted come TDL. Having Beck and Kapanen in the wings also helps.

If the trade is a good one, I say take it, as much as I appreciate Jake.
 
Last edited:

Sorinth

Registered User
Jan 18, 2013
11,746
6,417
People seem to assume his Agent won't have any input he definitely will.
The agent works for the player not the other way around. If a player wants only wants a few teams because of personal/family reasons then those are the teams the agent will actually work on getting deals with. The agent isn't going to constantly presenting offers from teams the player doesn't want to go to just because it's more money.
 

Habs13

Registered User
Dec 30, 2004
15,083
12,508
Montreal
Dvorak was a result of a GM in panic mode who lost danault for nothing.
He lost Danault and Kotkaniemi by being a jerk. True. But after Suzuki, we once again will only have one center come July, with a big question mark on Dach.

Dvorak was a panic move for sure and that's my point. Not to panic sign Evans to a contract higher than what he deserves.
 

DAChampion

Registered User
May 28, 2011
30,243
21,722
He lost Danault and Kotkaniemi by being a jerk. True. But after Suzuki, we once again will only have one center come July, with a big question mark on Dach.

Dvorak was a panic move for sure and that's my point. Not to panic sign Evans to a contract higher than what he deserves.

Not sure if Dvorak was a "panic" move. They might have picked up Dvorak because they thought he'd be a genuinely great player.
 

Tuggy

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 26, 2003
49,992
17,409
Saint John
I think 3.5 AAV is probably the max I'm comfortable with.

I could see him getting 4M, but anything over that is way too much.
 

Rapala

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
43,246
40,947
Montreal
The agent works for the player not the other way around. If a player wants only wants a few teams because of personal/family reasons then those are the teams the agent will actually work on getting deals with. The agent isn't going to constantly presenting offers from teams the player doesn't want to go to just because it's more money.
An agent has a vested interest and he will always advise the player to go to market ALWAYS and if he doesn't you need a new Agent.
When Hughes talked about being impressed with Bergeron he wasn't following his Agent's advise.
Obviously if Jake wants to stay put he's putting the cards in Kent Hughes' hands.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad