Akrapovince
Registered User
- May 19, 2017
- 3,862
- 4,355
I understand the argument but Mack didn’t sign what he is worth.MacK signed his contract extension just last year (they were probably expecting the Cap bump to happen at the end of this year), and he is the better player.
Makes no sense for Matthews to get more.
McDavid is worth the maximum the cap allows a player to be paid, his contract should not be a measuring stick when considering “fairly paid”.
Every contract however is based off of McDavid though, because regardless of how good MacKinnon or anyone else is, how is it justifiable to be paid millions above McDavid?
I’m not sure if the original poster wants what he’s worth in a vacuum, what he’s worth compared to other players or what he’s worth compared to other players if they were paid fairly.
In a vacuum as an arguable top five forward in the league, he should be paid just under maximum allowed.
Compared to what other players have signed including underpayments from McDavid, MacKinnon, etc he should be around 12.6 to 13. Or you can go to an extreme and take Draisatl’s cap percentage when he signed and say Matthews should not take a dollar more.
If everyone in the NHL was signed to what they were worth, he would be again under the max behind McDavid and MacKinnon, Draisatl etc.
Last edited: