What was the Point of Benching Brayden

[johnnyonthspot]

I am surprised that Jon Cooper would bench his number one centre before inter-division game! I think it took balls but what does it accomplish? He is also coaching him in the 4 Country Cup.
It obviously did not sit well with the Bolts who laid an egg rather than responding to their coaches decisive move.

 

[Barrie22]

I am surprised that Jon Cooper would bench his number one centre before inter-division game! I think it took balls but what does it accomplish? He is also coaching him in the 4 Country Cup.
It obviously did not sit well with the Bolts who laid an egg rather than responding to their coaches decisive move.

That no 1 player is bigger then the team. Point should not be missing meetings.

 

[DearDiary]

Cooper on scratching Point after missing a team meeting.

"We've had a standard since I've been here ... It's professional sports and you've got rules and nobody's above the law. It's unfortunate because this game we could have really needed him, but the one that probably feels the worst about it is Pointer."

 

[Chainshot]

I am surprised that Jon Cooper would bench his number one centre before inter-division game! I think it took balls but what does it accomplish? He is also coaching him in the 4 Country Cup.
It obviously did not sit well with the Bolts who laid an egg rather than responding to their coaches decisive move.

Cooper has done things like this before. A few years ago, he sat the entire Stamkos-Point-Kucherov line against a lottery team for an entire period. It didn't really help then either.

 

[GeeoffBrown]

Just trying to mess up your fantasy team!

 

[johnnyonthspot]

Cooper on scratching Point after missing a team meeting.

"We've had a standard since I've been here ... It's professional sports and you've got rules and nobody's above the law. It's unfortunate because this game we could have really needed him, but the one that probably feels the worst about it is Pointer."

I still do not get the benching. If he already felt bad ; then why pile on?I saw a clip of Bruce Boudreaux talking about failing to bench Ovi and only fine him for missing a meeting. He said it haunts him but it makes me wonder what the player/coach relationship is really like on NHL teams. Are they coaches or baby sitters?

 

[Barrie22]

I still do not get the benching. If he already felt bad ; then why pile on?I saw a clip of Bruce Boudreaux talking about failing to bench Ovi and only fine him for missing a meeting. He said it haunts him but it makes me wonder what the player/coach relationship is really like on NHL teams. Are they coaches or baby sitters?

They are the players boss, if you missed mandatory meetings at work what happens to you?

 

[johnnyonthspot]

They are the players boss, if you missed mandatory meetings at work what happens to you?

Most employees are not making millions of dollars but if I missed a meeting with a good reason I would like to think my boss would understand and not dock me pay.
Perhaps, the reason for missing is the issue not missing it.

 

[Il Stugotz]

As pro athletes, they're no strangers to tough love. They know the rules and so do I. A full commitment is what I'm thinking of. Equal treatment for every single guy. I just want to tell you how I'm feeling. I got to make you understand.

 

[Pablo El Perro]

I still do not get the benching. If he already felt bad ; then why pile on?I saw a clip of Bruce Boudreaux talking about failing to bench Ovi and only fine him for missing a meeting. He said it haunts him but it makes me wonder what the player/coach relationship is really like on NHL teams. Are they coaches or baby sitters?

It's just a policy. Some coaches are stricter than others on it. Seems the opposite of baby sitting, imo, as rather than being dragged around by this or that player you have a clear line and you enforce it.

 

[tarheelhockey]

I still do not get the benching. If he already felt bad ; then why pile on?I saw a clip of Bruce Boudreaux talking about failing to bench Ovi and only fine him for missing a meeting. He said it haunts him but it makes me wonder what the player/coach relationship is really like on NHL teams. Are they coaches or baby sitters?

There are 22 other guys in that room. So you tell Point he doesn’t need to worry about breaking the rules, what are you gonna tell Kucherov? Go down that road and eventually you have to crack down on some scapegoat rookie and you lose both the rookie and the room.

It seems to go without saying that Point didn’t have a legit reason to miss the meeting. Obviously he wouldn’t be benched for having the flu or for having a family crisis. He made a mistake, there was a consequence attached. If there’s an ongoing problem about it, the problem will be with Point.

 

[Hank Chinaski]

They are the players boss, if you missed mandatory meetings at work what happens to you?

This.

And I think most would agree, they value and respect a boss that holds everyone to the same standard; conversely, I think most people resent/despise bosses that give unequal and preferential treatment.

If Mikey Eyssimont (for example) is the one getting benched or scratched for missing a meeting, does this even merit a thread? Rhetorical question, obviously.

 

[DrMartinVanNostrand]

Ovechkin once got benched for missing practice.

Rules are in place for a reason and they have to be enforced equally.

EDIT: For some reason the link I'm sharing is coming through as a video even though the video is only embedded within the article itself. I'll just quote it instead:

Alex Ovechkin benched by Trotz for sleeping in.

It turns out the personal reason that kept Alex Ovechkin out of Tuesday night’s game was oversleeping.

The Washington Capitals captain told reporters Wednesday that was benched by head coach Barry Trotz when he showed up late to Tuesday’s morning skate.


Ovechkin said he had accidentally programmed his alarm for 8:30 p.m. instead of 8:30 a.m.

“It was an honest mistake,” Trotz told reporters after Wednesday’s practice, which did include Ovechkin. “We have certain accountability rules.”

 

[Three On Zero]

Cooper on scratching Point after missing a team meeting.

"We've had a standard since I've been here ... It's professional sports and you've got rules and nobody's above the law. It's unfortunate because this game we could have really needed him, but the one that probably feels the worst about it is Pointer."

/thread

 

[NVious]

I heard Point was mad at Petey and Pasta for stealing all the P headlines so he swung on cooper to get his name back into the pix.

 

[johnnyonthspot]

This.

And I think most would agree, they value and respect a boss that holds everyone to the same standard; conversely, I think most people resent/despise bosses that give unequal and preferential treatment.

If Mikey Eyssimont (for example) is the one getting benched or scratched for missing a meeting, does this even merit a thread? Rhetorical question, obviously.

The point , pun intended, is it was not some random 3rd or 4th liner who got benched. he made an example of a star player and the team proceeded to get smoked in their game without him while in a close playoff race. I know we cannot speculate as to the reasons he missed but perhaps that is what is most intriguing to me not the actual benching.

I also wonder if the team laid an egg to show the 'boss' they did not approve of his tactics?

 

[johan f]

Power tripping coach who throw away a good chance winning a game is not a decent person. Team not in balance going into a game with non normal event in mind.

 

[tarheelhockey]

The point , pun intended, is it was not some random 3rd or 4th liner who got benched. he made an example of a star player and the team proceeded to get smoked in their game without him while in a close playoff race. I know we cannot speculate as to the reasons he missed but perhaps that is what is most intriguing to me not the actual benching.

I also wonder if the team laid an egg to show the 'boss' they did not approve of his tactics?

The team probably laid an egg at least in part because they were unexpectedly missing their #1 center.

If that doesn’t motivate Point to elevate the team next time, what else would?

 

[Machinehead]

I think it's nice to have standards.

Pretty much everything the Rangers do is optional and you see the way they play.

 

[DrMartinVanNostrand]

The point , pun intended, is it was not some random 3rd or 4th liner who got benched. he made an example of a star player and the team proceeded to get smoked in their game without him while in a close playoff race. I know we cannot speculate as to the reasons he missed but perhaps that is what is most intriguing to me not the actual benching.

I also wonder if the team laid an egg to show the 'boss' they did not approve of his tactics?

First of all, the two late ENGs make it look worse than it was. It was a 4-2 game until then.

Regardless, this isn't the first time the Lightning have lost a game in a convincing manner, and Point played in most of those games. Bad games happen sometimes. It is what it is. "Subterfuge" or whatever is just nonsense thinking with nothing to support it.

 

[ShootIt]

As a Panthers fan I think the only thing to do is trade Point out west or suspend him for the year and fire Cooper.

 

[KirkAlbuquerque]

what is the point of anything?

 

[mr figgles]

Cooper on scratching Point after missing a team meeting.

"We've had a standard since I've been here ... It's professional sports and you've got rules and nobody's above the law. It's unfortunate because this game we could have really needed him, but the one that probably feels the worst about it is Pointer."

Nicknaming someone Pointer has to be against some sort of law too. Reporting to the ICC.

 

[John Mandalorian]

Brayden was the point.

 

[Hank Chinaski]

The point , pun intended, is it was not some random 3rd or 4th liner who got benched. he made an example of a star player and the team proceeded to get smoked in their game without him while in a close playoff race. I know we cannot speculate as to the reasons he missed but perhaps that is what is most intriguing to me not the actual benching.

I also wonder if the team laid an egg to show the 'boss' they did not approve of his tactics?

Ok, but what I’m saying is that in a team environment it’s going to backfire just as badly to enforce rules differently just because someone is a “star”.