TheBig08
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2024
- 161
- 47
great question maybe you or someone else can answer it.What if Tim Kerr was never injured? Or Mario Lemieux? Or Mike Bossy?
great question maybe you or someone else can answer it.What if Tim Kerr was never injured? Or Mario Lemieux? Or Mike Bossy?
not saying he's a bad player and that he wouldn't have slowed down i'm just saying what his career look like if didn't get injured, for example would he be more likely to end his carrer with close to or at 800 goals?
even if he didnt reach 800 he would be a lot closerMore than 50% chance of reaching 800 goals for no major leg injury stamkos....
He still has the lock-out, still has covid short season, still play most of his prime in the low scoring 2009-2017 hockey.
Give him a very nice 25 mores goals in 2014 and an other 40 in 2017, give him a nice 40 others extra goals spread around, that still 670.
And that generous 2x 50 goals seasons in there add around 5 goals per season elsewhere turning 3 others season in 50 goals one, he would have had like 6-7 of them.
A lot, but the next 130 goals getting close to 35 years old (at his current funk it could mean 125 goals past 35) is a lot. Brett Hull scored 25 as a 39 years old, a master at scoring that aged really well, scored 155 of those, not getting his 750 goal mark.
Obviously quite possible for him to do it, quite possible not.
When i compared him to ovechkin because before he was injured he was on a similar pace to ovi.I don't know if he'd age like Ovechkin in terms of always hitting 50, not just cause of aging but cause of the natural evolution of a player in his situation with his team having so many weapons as he aged that he didn't need to carry the burden of scoring as much, but yeah, Stamkos pre leg injury, what a beauty
one of the very few new NHL players I really like
one of the great guys in the league I think he's become so underrated and underappreciated