I would put Russia and Sweden, higher on the list.
Didn't Russia have a parade when they won it a few years back?
I have to ask...
Which hosting country has women who like to "party" the most?
No. It will never catch ice hockey in terms of popularity.
My country, Finland most likely gets most excited about WHC. Just look what happens when the world championship gold is won by Finland... Crazy celebrations. I think it was 2.3 million average viewers for that FIN-CAN final. At peak over 3 million viewers during that game and 84% of Finnish people watched the tournament at some point. Population of Finland is around 5.5 million.
Half of Europe qualifies for the Euros. It really is not an impressive feat nor should it be expected to be a one-time occurrence with the increased number of participating teams.It will be crucial what happens to Finland in tbe upcoming euros. Expectations are low but in a tournament there are always surprises.
However, Finland will not be a regular qualifier to major tournaments. This could be a once in a lifetime experience.
Half of Europe qualifies for the Euros. It really is not an impressive feat nor should it be expected to be a one-time occurrence with the increased number of participating teams.
Most popular, but only has 1 QF appearance in 8 years. That’s sad. I wonder what average Slovak says about state of Slovak hockey.
A lot of people in Finland were relieved that Finland lost because they can't stand the hullabaloo which follows if Finland wins the tournament.
I see you found the "True Finns" party's election candidatesi always thought finns celebrated in calmer way. just a handclap and thats it.
![]()
No, soccer is the number 1 sport especially among younger generationSlovakian soccer team is pretty good. Hockey's popularity still > soccer in SVK?
No soccer is more popular even tho tv rating may suggest hockey is more viewed. Ask any young kids what their favorite sport is 8/10 say footballSlovakian soccer team is pretty good. Hockey's popularity still > soccer in SVK?
This has to be parody at this point, right? If not, please have a look at the rosters yourself before commenting and embarrassing yourself. This advice doesn't concern just you but a significant number of other Canadians too.
Like others have mention, it has to be Finland. The only tournament win Canadians have danced in the streets to is the Olympics (with NHL participation)
Nothing like this would ever be seen in Canada for winning the WC. Here is the parade and celebration in Finland after 2011.
Just because Finland lost the Gold Medal, does not change the fact this was one of the weakest rosters Canada ever sent. I looked at this Canadian roster, and I predicted a QF loss against Russia. I said it on this Board. Russia, USA, and Finland were all better in the tournament, and were the better teams on paper. I was not impressed with the roster that was sent to play for Canada.
Nobody in Canada predicted the Gold Medal. Finland was the ones that embarrassed themselves with their inability to capitalize on the Power Play, then the fans blamed the refs afterwards for their poor performance. The Finnish fans ignored the fact that the goal they scored on the PP in the First Period, should not have been called a penalty. Canada had 30 Minutes in Penalties, Finland had 6.
To cover up their failure to win Gold as the favourite coming in, the Finnish fans are now attacking every Canadian fan who said the Finnish roster was not better than Canada's. The fact of the matter is Finland was the better team on paper. Your country treats this tournament like your Stanley Cup. There would be parades in Finland, like in the past if Finland had won. In Canada, there were no parades, and the next day we moved on to the Stanley Cup. We sent a team of 3rd and 4th liners, with a career backup goalie, and still won Gold against countries who take this tournament seriously. Enjoy your Silver and move on. Better luck next year.
No. It will never catch ice hockey in terms of popularity.
Wait what? On what planet did Finland have a better roster?
They only had 2 NHLrs and barely any of their better European based talent played, especially up front.
Their most dangerous forwards were a 19 year old (Lundell) and a NHL/AHL tweener (Ruotsalainen), and the #1 dman was Olli Maatta.
But surely the upcoming euros many finns will watch?
Before the tournament, all the so called "experts" had Finland along with Russia as the favourites to win Gold. This Canadian team was regarded as one of the weakest ever sent. We had to rely on a career backup goalie Darcy Kuemper to get it done.
Our NHL players gut shut out by Latvia 2-0, and were 0-3 to start the tournament. We were lucky to be in the QF. You can be a NHL player, and be a 4th liner, a bad offensive player/skater and a scrub. We were lucky to make it to the QF. Frankly, this tournament is treated like the Stanley Cup by Finland. You were the favourite to beat Canada. Canadians do not take this tournament seriously.
The Canadian and American teams also have struggled on the big ice surface, with different European officiating than NHL, at times in the past. The Russians and Finland teams should be embarrassed that they lost to this Canadian team. I am proud of our guys, but nobody saw it coming with this collection of players. Your team Finland was considered the favourite before the tournament began by the experts.
After you failed to get it done against this weak Canadian team, the Finnish fans are now trying to rewrite history by saying their team was not better than Canada, and that Canada was better with more NHL players (LOL). It does not matter about the quantity of NHL players, but the quality. I predicted Canada to lose in the QF. This Canadian team was a miracle, by barely making it to the QF, and beating stronger teams Russia, USA, and Finland. Instead of applauding that fact and the true Underdog Canada was, the Finnish fans are trying to tell us this was a very good Canadian team on paper. What a joke.
Yet the upshot for us in North America is that it's not a tourney that attracts very much atten