What jersey numbers do you think are just REAL UGLY numbers? | Page 5 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

What jersey numbers do you think are just REAL UGLY numbers?

I have less issues with numbers themselves and more with them being used by players who don't play a certain position, i.e. a forward or defenseman wearing 30-39. To me, those numbers are "goalie numbers". They look off when worn by anyone else.
 
All numbers are beautiful

Not equally so. For example, 27 is clearly lovelier than 61 and 19 can't hold a candle to 7.

In hockey, I don't care for any number over 35 ... unfortunately, Gretzky started this high-number silliness and it will never end now.

Is there any (natural) number under 100 that hasn't been used by regular-season players?
 
Not equally so. For example, 27 is clearly lovelier than 61 and 19 can't hold a candle to 7.

In hockey, I don't care for any number over 35 ... unfortunately, Gretzky started this high-number silliness and it will never end now.

Is there any (natural) number under 100 that hasn't been used by regular-season players?

I don't think McCauley got to use his 67's #98
#97 wasn't used before McDavid
 
I don't think McCauley got to use his 67's #98
#97 wasn't used before McDavid

pi-nhl-arizona-coyotes-jeremy-roenick-011415.vadapt.620.high.72.jpg

uhhh....
 
69 is a cool number because it's symmetrical: it looks like the Yin-Yang symbol. Sorry if people can't get past the sexual bit...

But overall, yeah - numbers aren't inherently ugly or pretty. What a weird topic.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad