ijuka
Registered User
- May 14, 2016
- 23,155
- 16,375
Marchessault probably didn't have good enough corsi. As good a reason to get rid of him and Gallant as any.Can't really have an issue with that contract. Best contract in the league.
Marchessault probably didn't have good enough corsi. As good a reason to get rid of him and Gallant as any.Can't really have an issue with that contract. Best contract in the league.
Gotta say, I thought they'd be horrible and I still don't get how exactly they're pulling this off. On paper, they look really terrible.
Have we seen a team so bad on paper play so well for an entire season in recent history?
Didnt know that about him. It looks very bad to give up on him. Was it a contract issue?
Gotta say, I thought they'd be horrible and I still don't get how exactly they're pulling this off. On paper, they look really terrible.
Have we seen a team so bad on paper play so well for an entire season in recent history?
Vegas is the only city where drugs, alcohol and a nightlife exists.How much of their home record is due to how they're playing vs their opponents rolling into the arena after getting loaded the night before?
That should be the city slogan! People would fly in from all over.Vegas is the only city where drugs, alcohol and a nightlife exists.
I don't think they have a single d-man who is a top pairing d-man on paper. Maybe Theodore and that's a big maybe given his lack of experience so far. Honestly, I wouldn't have thought a single d-man aside from Theodore would have any business playing anywhere but bottom pairing before this year. I also think the only forwards who are slotted where they'd seem to belong on paper are Neal, Jam, Smith (all top 6 guys arguably) Tuch (fine third line player) and Bellmare (solid 4c). Karlsson's career high was 25 points and now he's playing 1C - but he already has 29 in 35.Just curious, which players do you think look horrible on paper?
I don't think they have a single d-man who is a top pairing d-man on paper. Maybe Theodore and that's a big maybe given his lack of experience so far. Honestly, I wouldn't have thought a single d-man aside from Theodore would have any business playing anywhere but bottom pairing before this year. I also think the only forwards who are slotted where they'd seem to belong on paper are Neal, Jam, Smith (all top 6 guys arguably) Tuch (fine third line player) and Bellmare (solid 4c). Karlsson's career high was 25 points and now he's playing 1C - but he already has 29 in 35.
On paper, Imo, they looked like the worst team in the league by a fair margin. Obviously, out on the ice there's something different happening. It's fascinating.
Sounds about right. But you forgot Dylan Ferguson after the fourth goalie depth.One of the best stories of the year and their lineup looks like this.
Depth - Depth - Neal
Depth - Depth - Depth
Depth - Depth - Depth
Depth - Depth - Depth
Depth - Depth
Depth - Depth
Depth - Depth
MAF
Depth
Depth
Depth
There is obviosuly some sarcasm there, but holy ****. These guys brought hockey to VEGAS and have only lost TWO GAMES on home ice.
I love it.
Unfortunately, I don’t see them going far in the playoffs (smaller/tighter game, WC juggernauts to be up against) if they make it, but I’d love to be proved wrong.
Gotta say, I thought they'd be horrible and I still don't get how exactly they're pulling this off. On paper, they look really terrible.
Have we seen a team so bad on paper play so well for an entire season in recent history?
True enough, saying they have no business in the top 4 is too much, but I think they're ideally bottom pairing guys on a good, deep defense.While they may not have picked up a no.1 defenseman they still chose some solid top 4 defenseman. You underrate Schmidt and Miller if you think they don't belong on a top 4. Schmidt looked pretty good with Washington last year.
How much of their home record is due to how they're playing vs their opponents rolling into the arena after getting loaded the night before?