Atas2000
Registered User
- Jan 18, 2011
- 13,601
- 3,270
If Podkolzin was still in the KHL he would not have made the team maybe.I think the "Best" Russians are in the NHL though, like Ovechkin, Podkozlin and so for.
If Podkolzin was still in the KHL he would not have made the team maybe.I think the "Best" Russians are in the NHL though, like Ovechkin, Podkozlin and so for.
Something like this...
No Oscar Lindberg who is having the 6th best PPG in the KHL this season and no Tim Heed who's also having a great season in the KHL.
Meanwhile you have Leon ''Diver'' Bristedt, Emil Larsson (lol), Gustav Rydahl (lol) and Jacob De La Rose (LOL) on your roster.
Nobody watches the mens football during the Olympics. It's a really crappy tournament. The women's tournament maybe, but that's because they actually send the best players.
It really does not matter at all. If it makes you feel better though go ahead and believe it...I will hopefully be busy watching rescheduled NHL games.
10 out if the 12 countries aren't from north America.
USA has several states that couldn't tell you who Austin Matthews is or what a Stanley Cup is.
You've come to a non NHL discussion to let people from all over the world know that their views and opinions don't matter. Please stop.
You also said US is number 2... At the senior level their last gold was in 1996. Last Olympic gold was 1980. Canada is absolutely number 1 at the senior level... won the last 3 best on best. No argument. Not sure what you are using to say states are dominant at senior international hockey... But I'm guessing it is NHL rosters and U18 results.
I can speak for most countries outside the western hemisphere when I say “me”.
I think the "Best" Russians are in the NHL though, like Ovechkin, Podkozlin and so for.
In your opinion. Many of the best players in their youth are sent there. Most nations take it seriously. Messi remembers his medal in Beijing in 2008 with great fondness. Look at that team it was absolutely top notch with Riquelme and Messi in tandem. More and more teams are using it as a way to development the tournament experience of their youngsters.
One or two good team doesn't make a tournament. Argentina that time around had Australia, Ivory coast and Serbia in the group stage. It's rather meh in general.
More or less the whole Summer Olympics is nowadays, most of the sports noone really cares for.
Oscar Lindberg was part of the only line that did anything of value in the World Championships.oscar lindberg have been horrible for the nt. tim heed has a big chance to make it, yes.
bristedt have great chemistry with everberg and is having a good season.
larsson - rydahl - de la rose is checking line players who where our best line in the recent channel one cup. you are not even watching eht.
The best goal scorer outside of NHL should play first line minutes.Granlund - Manninen - Hartikainen
Pesonen - Filppula - Rajala
Komarov - Aaltonen - Ojamäki
Mäenalanen - Björninen - Anttila
Pakarinen, Kemppainen
Hietanen - Ohtamaa
Pokka - Kaski
Lindbohm - Kemiläinen
Koivisto - Sund
Olkinuora - Säteri - Heljanko
That whole Olympic tournament system is so messy that it's hard to understand for casual viewer. Qualification happens on U-21 or U-23 tournaments depending on the continent, and players have to be under 23 with some exceptions. Some countries like Spain, had to pretty much force their top players to join that tournament, while Germany and France didn't bother. I'm a big football fan, but i'd rather watch athletics or swimming than football during olympics.One or two good team doesn't make a tournament. Argentina that time around had Australia, Ivory coast and Serbia in the group stage. It's rather meh in general.
More or less the whole Summer Olympics is nowadays, most of the sports noone really cares for.
Olympics are supposed to be for amateur athletes.
Millionaire professionals shouldn't even be there.....
It will matter to the players who go and win medals. No matter the circumstances they will have those medals for life. You really have a narrow minded view and this is why the NHL and some fans from North America who are incredibly insular when it comes to sports attract opprobrium from European fans. The hockey universe does not revolve around the NHL and certainly would be less attractive and wealthy if it dod not have the European players who are taken for a pittance from their clubs.
This take is what 20,30 or 40 years too late.
Heck even before then the Iron curtain countries sent "professionals" to the Olympics in ice hockey.
Russia is exhibit A here.
You could say that, but no one gets recorded in the history books for "would've had the best team, if only...". Winning an Olympic gold, with or without NHL players, is still a very meaningful thing. Certainly for the players involved.
I'm not here trying to sell anything. No one here is suggesting that KHL players or SHL players are as good as NHL players. But still, in the grand scheme of things, players in Europe are professionals and capable of playing entertaining hockey. Otherwise, arenas in the domestic leagues over here would be empty.
And for the record, the IIHF and the World Championships have been around for about 100 years, way before the NHL seasons were 82 games + playoffs and progressed into june. Pretty much any other league, in any other sport (I guess the "big 4" in the U.S. being the exception) make schedules that gives players room to take part in international events. But in ice hockey, the NHL has outgrown the sport, and does whatever it wants - including hosting international events where national teams aren't even allowed to pick what players they want.
It's the Olympic tournament. The Olympics is the most prestigious tournament. Also, there are no answers in any tournament, only games.Really? Why would you care? Its such a pointless tournament without NHLers, and AHLers for that matter. It answers absolutely no questions, while being in a generally bad time zone for most hockey fans, while having a mediocre level of hockey and it all takes place in a country that should not be hosting any international event. All it does is make me hate the IIHF and IOC even more.
It's the Olympic tournament. The Olympics is the most prestigious tournament. Also, there are no answers in any tournament, only games.
It really does not matter at all. If it makes you feel better though go ahead and believe it...I will hopefully be busy watching rescheduled NHL games.
I never answers who is best, it only answers who won the game. And if it's like that in NA, it's like that. For many it does still matter.Sure there are answers, like who is the best. Who are the winners and losers. Every best on best tournament contributes to answering those questions.
In North America the Olympics had almost no prestige for hockey until the NHL joined. NA is the majority of hockey players, fans and revenue. Prestige came with the NHLers and is leaving with them.
I never answers who is best, it only answers who won the game. And if it's like that in NA, it's like that. For many it does still matter.