Right there is the biggest problem.
IMO as long as Charlie controls the fate of senior management, he will defer to Cam and Donnie. I don't believe it's in him to fire those 2.
Some think the Bruins senior management team is just fine. I don't happen to be among them. But I also don't believe it is changing until some extended, embarrassing failure happens. With the talent the team does have the next few years, I'm not expecting that. Nor do I expect them to be a top team with deep playoff potential.
That's the difficulty. They are not and probably won't be bad enough to compel massive changes as if there were no other choice. Yet they are probably not good enough to be a true contender. There are many teams in the NHL who are so-called middle of the pack and stay in that mode season after season. Unfortunately the Bruins probably have joined that group.
The consolation is that this comes after a long stretch where they were one of the top teams and had numerous top players. Cycle of life stuff. Maybe we get too spoiled. There are many teams that haven't had a good run in a long time and it has been misery for their fans. The Bruins may be on the other side of the mountain now and it's not the best of times but... we have some good times and players to remember and STILL there are a lot of teams today that are much worse off. I just hope whatever happens next is the right move, whatever that ends up meaning.
I don't expect any significant changes after this season in terms of front office or scouting (particularly pro scouting). I see this sort of like when they fell back to earth in 2000 and 2001. I didn't result in any major overhauls in the front office.
I don't expect Sacco back if they miss. What happens to the rest of the coaching staff is anyone's guess. You can't 1-4 forecheck/Neutral zone your way to a cup anymore. They need a coach who can communicate and teach a more modern style of play. I think Sacco and Co. are trying to do that but just aren't successful translating what they want to the players. And they don't really have the horses to play that game anyways up front with the lack of footspeed so it creates this snowball effect.
I just think their vision is flawed. Too much emphasis on two-way/defensive ability, grit, height, weight, toughness, fighting, jam, versatility, face-off ability. Not focus on the offensive aspects of the game like passing/puck distribution, shooting, finish, puck possession, speed and skating, etc. Still hanging onto this mythical "Bruin-type" player that has brought 1 cup in half a century. Quite simply I think there needs to be a better balance of skill-sets if they want to win in today's NHL.
Then factor in they seem obsessed with guys who can play wing and center, creating this almost position-less type of style where guys don't know where to be half the time. In the offensive zone I don't have an issue with it, but they are getting crossed-up in the defensive zone all the time. We fans are watching from above and sometimes it's hard to know who is playing C and who is playing which wing in the defensive zone. If you can't tell from above, how can you expect your guys to make the right read down at ice level?