GettingYourMoms
Registered User
- Jun 6, 2018
- 2,238
- 2,018
Give him an extension now.It´s his fault that we lost Zadina, booo!
That´s right! Give Zadina extension now!Give him an extension now.
agree with the first 2 paragraphsGuys, he's not getting fired. Yzerman had his chance after the road trip and didn't fire him. He's coaching out the remainder of his contract come hell or high water.
The "fire the coach" dream is dead.
Yzerman is most likely selling at TDL and drafting top 10. I think that was his goal all along.
Faster for FesterLalonde will get hired faster.
I know its going to suck but if we punt this season, sell at the deadline and have another strong draft we might be set up better in 3-4 years...Faster for Fester
I ask again, how much longer does this organization expect fans to keep paying to see a lackluster team on the ice? Clearly upper management sees this young season as a throwaway already, so why should fans be invested?
I know its going to suck but if we punt this season, sell at the deadline and have another strong draft we might be set up better in 3-4 years...
We can go young and trade them all except Mo, Razor, Kasper, Ed and Larkin. If we are going to suck anyway we need to be way younger than this...Problem is, we keep saying that for at least 3-4 years already...
Country ClubStupid Red Wings. You could have fired Lalonde and hired Montgomery but nope. We need to keep this train wreck going for some reason.
You say this like there is some easy way to have an alternative situation.Faster for Fester
I ask again, how much longer does this organization expect fans to keep paying to see a lackluster team on the ice? Clearly upper management sees this young season as a throwaway already, so why should fans be invested?
My brother in Christ, we're 5 years into Yzermans rebuild, 8 years into the rebuild altogether. 25 years of playoffs started well before I was born. I get "have patience", but why give deals to Kane and Tank and Gus when we had dudes waiting to fill those spots in the lineup?You say this like there is some easy way to have an alternative situation.
I mean I’ll point out this is the same org that gave you 20 consecutive years of playoff hockey and 4 Cups over that span.
They were going to have to re build eventually. Sorry, dude.
Who is being blocked by Kane, Tank and Gus? Who could legitimately be called up and have the team be in a equal or better position? Mazur was the next guy up but that's out. Lombardi, Danielson and Tuo or Wallinder would be the next in line and I don't think they would fare well in the NHL at this point.My brother in Christ, we're 5 years into Yzermans rebuild, 8 years into the rebuild altogether. 25 years of playoffs started well before I was born. I get "have patience", but why give deals to Kane and Tank and Gus when we had dudes waiting to fill those spots in the lineup?
Sounds more like Steve had higher expectations for where we should be. And in that case, why not make a coaching change?
I'll rephrase. I should've said "giving roster spots to established vets, such as Kane/Tank/Gus would indicate we're done with a rebuild and are going to start pushing for a playoff spot."Who is being blocked by Kane, Tank and Gus? Who could legitimately be called up and have the team be in a equal or better position? Mazur was the next guy up but that's out. Lombardi, Danielson and Tuo or Wallinder would be the next in line and I don't think they would fare well in the NHL at this point.
I won't refute your 2nd point though. I think the current roster is better than how they have performed. I find the "blame it in roster construction" to be fairly bogus. I think the best players, given this team is a bottom dweller, were brought in. What I'm not seeing is a cohesive system for the team. That falls on coaching to me.
I'll rephrase. I should've said "giving roster spots to established vets, such as Kane/Tank/Gus would indicate we're done with a rebuild and are going to start pushing for a playoff spot."
(although I do feel in this moment, Mazur would be an upgrade on Tank)
But their struggles, as you've stated, fall on coaching.
Which is all well and fine, but if we were going to sign guys to fill holes for one or two years, why not just extend Perron for a year or two, and/or not trade Fabbri? It'd have had the same effect, without breaking chemistry.I see those deals as proof the Wings are still rebuilding. they're all 1 and 2 years. They're fillers while the prospects continue to develop and join the team.