CabanaBoy5
Registered User
Ahhh gotta love a Dante's Inferno reference on HF.On the 4th ring of the 9th circle of hell, the snowball will do just fine.
You're right btw.
Ahhh gotta love a Dante's Inferno reference on HF.On the 4th ring of the 9th circle of hell, the snowball will do just fine.
Can’t afford him. If people think Kadri will get paid, why not him. Someone else would have to go.I’d love to see our big move be signing Nichushkin to play alongside JT and Nylander.
Very true...everyone is always enamored with Coleman and Goodrow along with this years special Nick Paul. But if we never even attempt to draft a high compete guy who will go through a wall...how are we going to get them when they hit UFA and are expensive. That is always the excuse...too expensive.
Easily do that dealArizona:
MathewsToronto:
Arizona 1st. pick 2022Carolina 1st. pick 2022Colorado 1st. pick 2022Arizona 1st. pick 2023Arizona 1st. pick 2024
Mrazak and 2022 1st to AZ for cap space.
Mrazek is not a dead weight. He had an unlucky year due to injury. I can’t see us moving on from him, let alone giving up a first to do so.Mrazak and 2022 1st to AZ for cap space.
Do you think he’ll be their number 1 goalie?Mrazek is not a dead weight. He had an unlucky year due to injury. I can’t see us moving on from him, let alone giving up a first to do so.
I think we all understood that JTs contract was "going to age rough", but there are a fair number,, myself included, who didn't like it from the start.JT contract was always going to age rough but we all accepted that.
Matthews and Marner deals are solid.
All three contracts would have been around 10 millionish if Covid would have been known. Completely screwed us. Could you imagine us with 5-10 million more cap space right now (probably near the higher number)
Projected cap before Covid for 2020-2021 was 84 million to 88.2 million. With the NHL still making big revenues even this season, I don't think its a stretch to say it would have been 90+ million this season.
Having 15+ million to play with would have been nice, thats for sure.
Prior to this year, Nichushkin’s highest NHL point total is 29 and considered a major bust. I don’t think he’s in the same sentence when it comes to salary in free agency as Kadri who has multiple 30+ goal seasons under his belt and is coming off over a PPG on top of playing a more coveted position.Can’t afford him. If people think Kadri will get paid, why not him. Someone else would have to go.
Can you get him signed 5/6x6 and move Nylander?
That’s 4 extra years at lower cost.
Late bloomer? Get him cheaper?Prior to this year, Nichushkin’s highest NHL point total is 29 and considered a major bust. I don’t think he’s in the same sentence when it comes to salary in free agency as Kadri who has multiple 30+ goal seasons under his belt and is coming off over a PPG on top of playing a more coveted position.
Late bloomer? Get him cheaper?
4 mil x 6 years? It’s a chance but one that could pay off. Champions usually have that move/salary that people go how?
Move Nylander for the right goalie/high end D.
Matthews - Marner
Tavares - Nichushkin
If you can get him on the Kadri 4.5 deal with term, 6 years, you can save yourself Nylander UFA in 2 years. Focus on Matthews re-sign and lower what could be a core member cost. Will it work? We should be looking at all options.The secret/strategy is to sign them before they breakout.
I think it’ll cost closer to 5 million a year for Nichushkin. Which is still doable. Kerfoot and Holl combined cost you 5.5 million. Nichushkin and Robertson combined cost you 5.8 million.Late bloomer? Get him cheaper?
4 mil x 6 years? It’s a chance but one that could pay off. Champions usually have that move/salary that people go how?
Move Nylander for the right goalie/high end D.
Matthews - Marner
Tavares - Nichushkin
Getting him signed for 6 years cheaper than Nylander, signing Matthews to 8 years on his next deal, losing Tavares 11 million in 3 years and moving Nylander for a core D piece or high end goalie could put us in a very good spot for the future.I think it’ll cost closer to 5 million a year for Nichushkin. Which is still doable. Kerfoot and Holl combined cost you 5.5 million. Nichushkin and Robertson combined cost you 5.8 million.
Getting him signed for 6 years cheaper than Nylander, signing Matthews to 8 years on his next deal, losing Tavares 11 million in 3 years and moving Nylander for a core D piece or high end goalie could put us in a very good spot for the future.
Maybe not immediately but we are only spinning our wheels now, but with some additional solid drafting and hopefully guys like Amirov/Knies breaking in a couple of years.
That’s too bad. I believe if we don’t prepare a new future (and prepare for it), we will be doomed to repeat the past.There is no taking a step back. Shanny and Dubas have set the bar too high making fans believe this team can win a SC when it can't win a f'n round.
That’s too bad. I believe if we don’t prepare a new future (and prepare for it), we will be doomed to repeat the past.
And we might lose more than an alteration now would do.
The secret/strategy is to sign them before they breakout.
Mrazek is not a dead weight. He had an unlucky year due to injury. I can’t see us moving on from him, let alone giving up a first to do so.
You could still move Kerfoot and Mich, sign Nich and run with Nylander if the price is right.I think it’ll cost closer to 5 million a year for Nichushkin. Which is still doable. Kerfoot and Holl combined cost you 5.5 million. Nichushkin and Robertson combined cost you 5.8 million.
Nichushkin is a speedster - he won't work with Tavares any better than Nylander does.Late bloomer? Get him cheaper?
4 mil x 6 years? It’s a chance but one that could pay off. Champions usually have that move/salary that people go how?
Move Nylander for the right goalie/high end D.
Matthews - Marner
Tavares - Nichushkin