Unknown Caller
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 10,404
- 8,229
I'd be fine with 5.5 or under but I'm expecting over at this point cause that's what's guaranteed to set this place off. Hell I don't think people would even love anything over 5 but people are too scared of the cap at times.What is the AAV? Has that been confirmed yet?
I see people seemingly reacting to numbers, but haven't seen any of the posts in question because the fake tweets keep getting deleted.
If this was a 3 year deal all the naysaying wouldn't be here so let's enjoy 3 years then start griping because 5M in 4 years is gonna be like 3.5M now and a buyout will be not bad at all if he falls apart.
Even on a 3 year deal, he would probably be rough in the 3rd year. The two extra years tacked on are painful. Could easily see him being our next Johnsson as early as this year.
“We need to get bigger and add leadership and winning veterans to this team”
*Fitz goes out and gets that player*
“NO NOT THIS ONE”
“We need to get bigger and add leadership and winning veterans to this team”
*Fitz goes out and gets that player*
“NO NOT THIS ONE”
Nobody said winning veterans. Bigger sure, but that’s not really Palat so it doesn’t even do that. You could go get any number of veterans at much cheaper prices to fill the experience role (as we did with Boyle and Simmonds).
At 35/36 years old? He’s not Jagr.
I’ve DEFINITELY seen people around here saying this team lacks leadership and is basically just a bunch of kids doing what they want.Nobody said winning veterans. Bigger sure, but that’s not really Palat so it doesn’t even do that. You could go get any number of veterans at much cheaper prices to fill the experience role (as we did with Boyle and Simmonds).
At 35/36 years old? He’s not Jagr.Could also easily see him being a positive for this team through years 3, 4, and 5.
I specifically said I didn’t want Palat, even more so after we missed out on Gaudreau.Wasn't Palat someone everyone on this board wanted earlier today? Now we have him and everyone's bitching because it's one extra year than you're all comfortable with?
Who cares
Wasn't Palat someone everyone on this board wanted earlier today? Now we have him and everyone's bitching because it's one extra year than you're all comfortable with?
Who cares
Wasn't Palat someone everyone on this board wanted earlier today? Now we have him and everyone's bitching because it's one extra year than you're all comfortable with?
Who cares
Definitely wasn’t a panic move. Was just Fitz overvaluing and chasing grit and experience and championship pedigree. Anything at $5m or more per year is going to be ugly.
Eklund says between 5-6, but it's eklund so take with a grain of saltI hope the AAV doesn't exceed $5 million if it's 5 years