GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 193,374
- 43,673
The Seahawks lead the West.
It’s not. As you can drain over 2 minutes off the clock as you would use up the full 40 second play clock between plays so over 2:10 should come off the clock if you can’t convert another first.You've already won the game though. Under 5 minutes. It's a bitch move by the Packers.
You actually think the 49ers have enough time to score three touchdowns just to tie it with only 5:00 left? lmao There's no need to punt there either. They were in FG range. It's a bitch move by the Packers.It’s not. As you can drain over 2 minutes off the clock as you would use up the full 40 second play clock between plays so over 2:10 should come off the clock if you can’t convert another first.
If you punt SF is going to run more plays on that 2:10 than the 3 GB would run.
Not super surprising that it took a while to get Macdonald's defense in order. It's supposed to be very involved with the linebackers' dropping and all that jazz.What a 180 for the Hawks defense, very happy with that squad. Wish the O would be more consistent.
The Seahawks started 3-0, thus in first place, and then two week ago they were in last place, now they are in first againThe Seahawks lead the West.
Not a win/loss thing or score thing. GB wants the game to end faster. Keeping the ball does that. With 5 minutes to go, if GB can secure 2 firsts the game will be over in 8 plays or so.You actually think the 49ers have enough time to score three touchdowns just to tie it with only 5:00 left? lmao There's no need to punt there either. They were in FG range.
As always a Raiders game turns when Minschew throws the pick. TD off that and Denver never looks back.Cool, Broncos cover. I was about to murder a mf
They already won the game. End it faster? Not sure what you're on about. I was surprised they didn't start using their timeouts to get the ball back at the end there.Not a win/loss thing or score thing. GB wants the game to end faster. Keeping the ball does that. With 5 minutes to go, if GB can secure 2 firsts the game will be over in 8 plays or so.
They had no timeoutsball on the 1 needing a score and raiders call two pass plays lmao
clowns
Ending the game faster means that the game clock continues to tick when GB has the ball as they are not throwing passes to risk incomplete passes to stop the clock, nor would they run out of bounds.They already won the game. End it faster? Not sure what you're on about. I was surprised they didn't start using their timeouts to get the ball back at the end there.