No matter how many times the "Weather" thread is locked, warnings given, and reopened, HFOil always steers back into the climate debate (and related areas).
I agree. Re-reading I should have clarified why I responded to your post before making that statement.
The Onion title for Staples article would read, "Shocking: Province with minimal alterative energy infrastructure relies on fossil fuels for energy during cold snap!"
Wasn't the point at all and unless you're in the middle of this 10 day deep freeze dipping into -40 or worse every night you don't really know how much this is a hot topic in Edmonton, excuse pun. There was nothing irregular about posting up all the news that is related to this deep freeze, and which is front page news here every day.
The intent was not to argue climate change, it was merely pointing out how NECESSARILY dependant we are on fossil fuels to even survive here. I don't like Staples as a writer, he's merely a source, the one citing that 94.5% of the energy used on one day during this cold snap was Fossil fuel. The other link being that Alberta was maxed out and was on level 2 emergency and verging on 3 in our power supply.
Several people thanked me for the post, it was not political, it was not climate science, it was commentary and it was important news. It was also extremely relevant in a weather thread, in Edmonton, to mention to readers that the region was potentially in a energy blackout situation and that several conservation advisories and alerts had been issued. Of course its good to note that to people.
But anyway, your bolded statement is interesting, is completely false, and is hypocritical in light of you advising others not to make this verge into another controversial area. Alberta is becoming a leader in Solar and Wind energy. Not that you would apparently know. But the bolded is entirely unnecessary comment all things considered and you shouldn't be making it.
Besides which you missed the entire point. Wind energy isn't so effective when a stalled weather system is planted in the Prairies and the wind isn't significant enough to generate and or the turbines are f***ing frozen in place. Solar energy, you might imagine, does not yield a bumper crop of energy at this latitude in January due to the inclination of the sun here at this time of year and the very short days. So that it wouldn't matter how much solar or wind energy sources we have here, they do not generate much here, during peak demand.
This was all clear in the articles cited.