WCSF | VI | "Because It's The Cusp" | Oilers vs. Canucks | 5.18.24 | 6:00PM | SN/CBC

[Bond]

Easy no goal and probably should have been a penalty

 

[Kairi Zaide]

That was weird.

Silovs was sealing the post in reverse VH and then went out to challenge the shot when McDavid already established position.

But guess you gotta be out of the crease

The goalie always has priority in the crease. The established position thing is only when the contact happens outside the crease.

 

[oilers4life5]

Hahaha. Some Nucks fans are saying that should be a 6 min penalty on McDavid. Come get your boys. That’s a hilarious low hockey iq take.

 

[JTB1974]

Even if McDavid was slightly pushed, He went right into the crease on his own accord and you have to allow the goalie an opportunity to make the save which he never had a chance to. The crease belongs to the goalie.

 

[The don godfather]

True. If you allow that one then this one should be allowed.

Bruins got robbed . The end.

 

[Czechboy]

It's funny because the Oil didn't challenge it and went to break..
Next 5 pages will be 'Oilers think it should count' arguments.lol

 

[Bizzare]

Bouchard also jumped into Lindholm who was coming to hit him, can’t believe they missed that clear charging call.

 

[jackjohnson]

Silovs diving lmao, canucks look absolutely awful

Where was the dive when mcbaby shoved his big butt into Silovs face

 

[SeanMoneyHands]

Superstar Skinner back in form.

 

[Canucks LB]

Hahaha. Some Nucks fans are saying that should be a 6 min penalty on McDavid. Come get your boys. That’s a hilarious low hockey iq take.

Just take a breath my man, nobody is saying that lol

 

[Sergei Shirokov]

So jumping up is incidental contact and NOT charging? Noted

We relearn the rule book everyday

 

[petterdaddy]

Idk maybe he just annoys me but something with McDavid’s body language is really weird this whole series.

 

[nerevarine]

Hahaha. Some Nucks fans are saying that should be a 6 min penalty on McDavid. Come get your boys. That’s a hilarious low hockey iq take.

Most of them started watching this year

 

[Dust]

Easy no goal and probably should have been a penalty

There's no way they are going to call that lol.

 

[Czechboy]

Hahaha. Some Nucks fans are saying that should be a 6 min penalty on McDavid. Come get your boys. That’s a hilarious low hockey iq take.

Couldn't agree more.. he should be banned for life! No room in this game for McDavid's recklessness.lol

 

[AwesomeInTheory]

Mostly just surprised Connor lowered himself to trying to screen the goalie.

Yeah, it's like a mule with a spinning wheel. Damned how he got there and damned if he knows what he's doing.

 

[Pablo El Perro]

It’s actually Gouché, pronounced Goo-Shay.

If he played for the Leafs it would be Biecharde. Pronounced Bye-Car

 

[2023FriendshipTour]

Likely because the penalty if they lost to start the period could be a problem.

Oh for sure hard one to challenge when he was able to jump defs lots gping on there

 

[Wildcarder]

Likely because the penalty if they lost to start the period could be a problem.

Not with the Canucks powerplay...

 

[JKG33]

Was Silovs shot? I heard a rumor there may be a second shooter...

Took lessons from McDavid

 

[Three On Zero]

It's funny because the Oil didn't challenge it and went to break..
Next 5 pages will be 'Oilers think it should count' arguments.lol

Charging! God dammit

 

[Dessloch]

The good news for Oilers is that refs will give them a few soft PPs to compensate for this

 

[Bond]

Likely because the penalty if they lost to start the period could be a problem.

Nah. That one wasn’t even questionable

 

[Matty Sundin]

mhmmm

did they get push in?

at least the refs maintain the same standard from last nigh

It probably right call…he was in the crease and yeah there was contact but Silovs doing his best 2011 Canucks impression made it look worse

 

[Straight Fire]

Right call