GDT: WCS Game #2 | Detroit Red Wings @ Chicago Blackhawks | 1:00 PM EST | NBC / CBC / RDS

vladdy16

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
2,551
375
Smith playing better for the rest of the period doesn't absolve him of responsibility on that goal.

Yes it does. If the wings start to play tentative the Hawks will eat them alive. It was a pedestrian 3 on 2 that if Cleary played properly is just a foot note in a high pace game. Smith was a net positive that period. Coulda put them up 1 early.

That goal is definitely on him, he turned the puck over and didn't give any effort to get back.

Cleary at least skated to get back, he covered the wrong guy, but at least he was covering someone.

That's not how it works. Covering someone who's already covered doesn't count as covering someone.
 

The Zetterberg Era

Ball Hockey Sucks
Nov 8, 2011
41,231
12,105
Ft. Myers, FL
c'mon you dont think Smith getting picked off was the major reason why 3-1 was created?

Yeah Smith getting a hook up in his hands and then shouldered before the puck gets there is a part of it. Guess he should have snapped his head up and pretended to be shot. Oh well, nobody is mistake free in this game. I thought his play was actually much better from last game.

Our forwards still need to be way more available then they have been. We need to start forechecking and being more aggressive. Our D will continue to look bad, the game is running downhill at them, the ice is tilted a lot and the forwards need to help do their part.
 

chances14

Registered User
Jan 7, 2010
10,429
551
Michigan
Yes it does. If the wings start to play tentative the Hawks will eat them alive. It was a pedestrian 3 on 2 that if Cleary played properly is just a foot note in a high pace game. Smith was a net positive that period. Coulda put them up .

Instead the wings are down a goal because of an awful pinch

Just because cleary messed up too doesn't mean smith gets a pass
 

vladdy16

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
2,551
375
c'mon you dont think Smith getting picked off was the major reason why 3-1 was created?

It was a 3 on 2 that got broken up. Scoring chance didn't happen til Cleary messed up.

Obviously Smith has to make a stronger play initially. He made a lot of strong plays that period though.
 

Yemack

Registered User
Oct 30, 2007
8,246
5
lol wtf?

Almost every other post is about how he sucks and should be in the AHL.

there are two extremes, the ones who wants to trade his ass and the ones wants to kiss his ass

Im just a fan trying to watch this game and calling spade a spade. Smith was responsible for that play and if anyone dont see that, ... well
 

vladdy16

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
2,551
375
lol there has been 1 goal scored, and hes at fault....so I would say that's a start to having a bad game. People like you are just gonna defend players they like no matter what happens, so no sense in discussing it with you. Smith is an all-star. Top 5 D in the NHL...better yet, top 5 player in the NHL. He deserves 9 million in the off season.

I'm not so sure I'm the one suffering from confirmation bias in this instance y'all
 

aar000n

Registered User
Oct 16, 2006
9,995
822
Yes it does. If the wings start to play tentative the Hawks will eat them alive. It was a pedestrian 3 on 2 that if Cleary played properly is just a foot note in a high pace game. Smith was a net positive that period. Coulda put them up 1 early.



That's not how it works. Covering someone who's already covered doesn't count as covering someone.
He's right that goals on cleary
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad