As for DC's talent, Lavi's working with what he has. He's been pretty consistent with his assessments and actions, as has the GM. We even have other players saying CMM needs work. It's not some anti-youth bias by Lavi.
I agree with that assessment of his track record, too, but it's not the Ekholms, Forsbergs, Josis, and Joneses that we're talking about here. What's his track record with talent more in line with what we actually have? Name the players that he gave shots to and helped develop at the NHL level, not a list of stars that were locks regardless.
There are plenty of coaches, including some great ones, that don't do much of that unless they have little choice, and others that are all about it, for better and worse. Lavi is definitely more that second type.
I don't think he's got anything against young players, but it's pretty clear that if you give him a veteran option, he's going to go that way more often than not. What I saw from Lavi this year was that he gave the couple available spots he had to the best players in camp. Protas and Gus earned those spots. CMM didn't impress in the preseason. What he did last year didn't seem to count for much, and maybe it shouldn't.
If there's blame to be handed out on this specific issue, it's probably more on MacLellan. Laviolette would have had to make another choice or two if Mac hadn't signed MoJo or kept Eller. If this were all on Lavi and everyone else wanted the kids to play, "everyone else" had the power to make that happen for sure.
Having said that, MoJo turned out to be a good move. I'm less sold on keeping Eller, but retaining depth when you have a shitload of guys injured isn't so bad.
So I'm not angry at the coach or GM over this right now. I personally would have handled things differently, but what the hell do I know? I think we're too conservative about finding out what we have in our prospects. Your mileage may vary.