Corby78
65 - 10 - 20
Ummm.. he didn’t include the fifth receiver running down field and we have two open guys underneath. So the answer is one of the open guys...
Next 7 games should say a lot about this team since they're playing a bunch of fellow basement dwellers. Schedule: vs LA (Rams), @ NYG, vs DAL, vs NYG, @ DET, vs CIN, @DAL
Any predictions? I'm going 3-4: L, W, L, W, L, W, L
Next 7 games should say a lot about this team since they're playing a bunch of fellow basement dwellers. Schedule: vs LA (Rams), @ NYG, vs DAL, vs NYG, @ DET, vs CIN, @DAL
Any predictions? I'm going 3-4: L, W, L, W, L, W, L
There's a lot the offense can improve to help Haskins, but this picture 'aint it. There outside receiver is in 1-on-1 coverage and there's two wide open guys underneath as check-down options.
they already offered him 5 years 175 mil, 100 guaranteed....he said no. Gaudy early numbers aside, when he wins the big game, I’ll be surprised. I wouldn’t give the guy a blank check, but I certainly believe he would make us credible. Cowboys have built around him and we don’t have those niceties here for him though....
Yeah I'm not sure what the complaint is there. Some plays are supposed to have receivers crossing or running parallel routes, or even "picking" the defender. It's not always about "spacing".
1, 2 or even 3 receivers in the same area happens but not 4. With that many receivers one should be the safe check down.
There are 2 guys wide open underneath. We can't see the starting formation or what the play was. It looks like someone at the bottom is running a deep post, while nearby someone else is running a deep cross. Underneath is probably some other level of crossing pattern, possibly levels concept with 2 guys, or one guy on a cross/slant and the other releasing after blocking. Hard to say.
They probably do have a lot of issues in running good routes but this pic is probably not the best example.
Welp.
QB isn't the issue...