Toggle sidebar

GDT: Washington at New York Pt. II

  • Thread starter Thread starter *Bob Richards*
  • Start date Start date
  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Grind Jam Grind said:
Pyatt has a little more TOI than Zuccs. Wtf.
Click to expand...

I almost hope he's injured since he is hardly the reason we are conceding goals. But his playtime is reduced when the rangers lose, so I'm curious if his size will forever be his undoing until another coach arrives that don't hate vertically challenged individuals.
 
Cant wait for Rangers to lose so Zuccarello can come play for a better team, Norway.
 
I cant say this team is leading me drink, but its definitely making me drink more!!!
 
Guess What said:
No stop it with trading G and Callahan. DZ I'm starting to get on board with because he isn't consistent and mises the net too much.
Click to expand...

Cally will never turn it up in the playoffs and we're better off getting a legit points-getter on D than Girardi.

Of course, only after Torts get the pink slip and a slap to the face.
 
3 weeks in and I'm still irked over picking the worst time to quit smoking.
 
Got very lucky there. Absolutely not allowed to skate with the goaltender's stick in your hand if you aren't the goaltender lol
 
Who needs Zucc? We have Pysie! He knows how to turn away from his point men for a goal against. Good thing Torts trusts him so much.
 
Grind Jam Grind said:
No. Every coin flip is 50-50. What happened last time has no effect on the next trial. Gambler's fallacy.
Click to expand...

Yes, I know.

Each coin flip is 50-50. Thats why going forward, we have two games. The result is in the past, we're down 2-0. Going forward there is a 50% chance we lose each game - meaning, there is a 25% chance we lose this game and the next.

The probabilities of the previous results are now 1.

I essentially explained the opposite of the gamblers fallacy and you interpreted it as the gambler fallacy.
I'm assuming you just misinterpreted what I wrote.

At Game 1:
There was a 6.25% chance of losing 4 games. .5^4
At Game 2
There was a 12.5% chance of losing the next 3 games. 1^1*(.5)^3
Now its Game 3:
Two events are now (1)s, meaning that the probability as of this point is (1*1*.5*.5)

If I had said the chances were still 6.25%, that would be the gambler's fallacy.
 
Always stays the same, nothing ever changes
The Rangers' powerplay, they just pass for ages
Always stays the same, nothing ever changes
The Rangers' powerplay, they just pass for ages

Was listening to English Summer Rain by Placebo and changed the lyrics :laugh:
 
Artemia said:
Cant wait for Rangers to lose so Zuccarello can come play for a better team, Norway.
Click to expand...

He's been banned from the national team since he dared to endorse a foreign betting company (they are supporting his new foundation, the Zucca-fund).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom