Confirmed with Link: Walman and a 2nd Round Pick traded to SJ

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
15,267
8,412
Bellingham, WA
You know, Stevie isn't in the locker room every game or every practice. You have to figure someone, either coach or player had to have gone to Stevie to complain. I'd like to know who that Karen is, and kick him off the team. I have a feeling it's Fester, he seems easily butthurt.

In any case, I hope Walman continues to light it up so that Stevie focuses on winning instead of protecting this loser team culture.
 

RabidBadger

Mazur detractors will look like dummies!
Sep 9, 2007
3,490
1,875
Detroitish
I'm sure everyone would be so happy if we sucked this bad with Walman instead of without him. Pretty sure the result is the same even if he wasn't traded. But hey, you would get to watch suckiness with effort (that he clearly lacked the end of last season)and that infectious personality. Zadina gave good effort too. Let us lament Filip and Jacob.
 

Redwing66

Registered User
Oct 3, 2020
217
213
Can’t believe some of the analysis praising getting rid of defensive talent and a second round draft pick. This “trade” was an offseason lowlight that setup the season we now witness. Horrid moves beget horrid teams. Walman deserved a better fate wish there was future considerations given to the trash we’d watch this year.
 

Realgud

Not good enough for SKA
Nov 4, 2013
5,780
7,228
realguddraftsimulator.com
The comments from Larkin that whatever locker room issue was "addressed in the offseason" look absolutely awful right now. Larkin isn't having a great season based on his standard (still a vgood player, don't get me wrong) and the team dropped from a top 5 offense for most of last season to dead last in the league now. If anything, this makes me heavily question the leadership/coaching in place if their opinion was that Walman was such a problem that you had to get rid of him and the result now is being arguably a bottom 3 team in the NHL after almost making it into the playoffs last season. This trade was, and still is, inexcusable. Ofc it was fair to give it the benefit of the doubt and wait for this season to be underway and assess the trade after seeing where the team would be, but it's quite obvious that losing Walman for less than nothing was a major blunder at this point. Maybe the team goes on a hot streak and proves us wrong but I find that hard to believe.

I know people want to "get over it" but this needs to be mentioned as long as team looks a bad as they do and Walman looks as good as he does.
 
Last edited:
Oct 18, 2006
14,744
2,333
Was going through videos on my phone and came across one I took February 11, Walman scoring in OT. The boys all so pumped up, Walman totally pumped up. What the heck happened towards the end of last season that was SO BAD that Yzerman literally threw him aside and gave up a second? Unreal. Like it boggles the mind that it could’ve been that bad.
 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,511
16,972
Was going through videos on my phone and came across one I took February 11, Walman scoring in OT. The boys all so pumped up, Walman totally pumped up. What the heck happened towards the end of last season that was SO BAD that Yzerman literally threw him aside and gave up a second? Unreal. Like it boggles the mind that it could’ve been that bad.
Probably the 1 point and -9 in his last 18 games which were the Wings' last 31 games.
 
Oct 18, 2006
14,744
2,333
Probably the 1 point and -9 in his last 18 games which were the Wings' last 31 games.
Yeah. But why? Injured? And poor rehab? Are we not an organisation that can deal with poor patches? Or even poor choices? When the guy in question is a valuable member of our pretty pathetic defence.

And we struggled down the stretch, goes to show his impact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheClap and Realgud

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,511
16,972
Yeah. But why? Injured? And poor rehab? Are we not an organisation that can deal with poor patches? Or even poor choices? When the guy in question is a valuable member of our pretty pathetic defence.

And we struggled down the stretch, goes to show his impact.
I highly doubt Walman or Yzerman will go into specifics. And no, we aren't yet an organization that can deal with poor patches. Still very fragile. We ride highs and lows. An emotional bunch that gets down itself relatively easily when things aren't going well. As the core alongside Dylan get older, that should hopefully level out.

I mean... it wasn't a good impact... so...
 

Retire91

Stevey Y you our Guy
May 31, 2010
6,354
1,825
Yeah. But why? Injured? And poor rehab? Are we not an organisation that can deal with poor patches? Or even poor choices? When the guy in question is a valuable member of our pretty pathetic defence.

And we struggled down the stretch, goes to show his impact.

Complete speculation. If I were to take an honest to goodness guess, its feels like involvement with one or more of the other player's girls like back in the day Carter Hartnel, or something personally equivalent like money nightlife drugs theft that are not easily worked through. I mean the level of health care these people have access to is off the charts and that would include mental health with councilors who's whole profession is conflict resolution and organizational psychology. Whatever it was it was felt by the organization it was unworkable.
 
Last edited:

TheClap

Registered User
Jul 20, 2014
443
353
Complete speculation. If I were to take an honest to goodness guess, its feels like involvement with one or more of the other player's girls like back in the day Carter Hartnel, or something personally equivalent like money nightlife drugs theft that are not easily worked through. I mean the level of health care these people have access to is off the charts and that would include mental health with councilors who's whole profession is conflict resolution and organizational psychology. Whatever it was it was felt by the organization it was unworkable.
This is some wildly speculative bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geezer WC

ricky0034

Registered User
Jun 8, 2010
15,496
7,958
This is some wildly speculative bullshit.

I think it should be clear to everyone at this point that what actually happened is Walman got replaced by an identical looking alien and Yzerman knows and was extremely unnerved by it but couldn't get out of the contract because he doesn't have any actual proof so he traded him away

the future considerations are that San Jose will trade him back if the original Walman ever returns
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheClap

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,845
11,415
You know, Stevie isn't in the locker room every game or every practice. You have to figure someone, either coach or player had to have gone to Stevie to complain. I'd like to know who that Karen is, and kick him off the team. I have a feeling it's Fester, he seems easily butthurt.

In any case, I hope Walman continues to light it up so that Stevie focuses on winning instead of protecting this loser team culture.

My honest thought is Ben Chiarot. He gives off the my shit don't stink vibe and I'm really important vibe as well to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: norrisnick

JoesuffP

Registered User
Feb 3, 2016
618
348
Or we had to structure the cap and walman and matta were the only defensmen that were tradeable

Larkin’s comments were very telling tho about as much as a guy like Larkin would ever get into specifics. I always remember Walman playing like crap for a couple weeks every time he hit the griddy. He always did it after a big goal tho
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad