Confirmed with Link: Walman and a 2nd Round Pick traded to SJ

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
15,261
8,409
Bellingham, WA
You know, Stevie isn't in the locker room every game or every practice. You have to figure someone, either coach or player had to have gone to Stevie to complain. I'd like to know who that Karen is, and kick him off the team. I have a feeling it's Fester, he seems easily butthurt.

In any case, I hope Walman continues to light it up so that Stevie focuses on winning instead of protecting this loser team culture.
 

RabidBadger

Mazur detractors will look like dummies!
Sep 9, 2007
3,490
1,874
Detroitish
I'm sure everyone would be so happy if we sucked this bad with Walman instead of without him. Pretty sure the result is the same even if he wasn't traded. But hey, you would get to watch suckiness with effort (that he clearly lacked the end of last season)and that infectious personality. Zadina gave good effort too. Let us lament Filip and Jacob.
 

Redwing66

Registered User
Oct 3, 2020
217
213
Can’t believe some of the analysis praising getting rid of defensive talent and a second round draft pick. This “trade” was an offseason lowlight that setup the season we now witness. Horrid moves beget horrid teams. Walman deserved a better fate wish there was future considerations given to the trash we’d watch this year.
 

Realgud

Not good enough for SKA
Nov 4, 2013
5,778
7,223
realguddraftsimulator.com
The comments from Larkin that whatever locker room issue was "addressed in the offseason" look absolutely awful right now. Larkin isn't having a great season based on his standard (still a vgood player, don't get me wrong) and the team dropped from a top 5 offense for most of last season to dead last in the league now. If anything, this makes me heavily question the leadership/coaching in place if their opinion was that Walman was such a problem that you had to get rid of him and the result now is being arguably a bottom 3 team in the NHL after almost making it into the playoffs last season. This trade was, and still is, inexcusable. Ofc it was fair to give it the benefit of the doubt and wait for this season to be underway and assess the trade after seeing where the team would be, but it's quite obvious that losing Walman for less than nothing was a major blunder at this point. Maybe the team goes on a hot streak and proves us wrong but I find that hard to believe.

I know people want to "get over it" but this needs to be mentioned as long as team looks a bad as they do and Walman looks as good as he does.
 
Last edited:
Oct 18, 2006
14,744
2,331
Was going through videos on my phone and came across one I took February 11, Walman scoring in OT. The boys all so pumped up, Walman totally pumped up. What the heck happened towards the end of last season that was SO BAD that Yzerman literally threw him aside and gave up a second? Unreal. Like it boggles the mind that it could’ve been that bad.
 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,505
16,960
Was going through videos on my phone and came across one I took February 11, Walman scoring in OT. The boys all so pumped up, Walman totally pumped up. What the heck happened towards the end of last season that was SO BAD that Yzerman literally threw him aside and gave up a second? Unreal. Like it boggles the mind that it could’ve been that bad.
Probably the 1 point and -9 in his last 18 games which were the Wings' last 31 games.
 
Oct 18, 2006
14,744
2,331
Probably the 1 point and -9 in his last 18 games which were the Wings' last 31 games.
Yeah. But why? Injured? And poor rehab? Are we not an organisation that can deal with poor patches? Or even poor choices? When the guy in question is a valuable member of our pretty pathetic defence.

And we struggled down the stretch, goes to show his impact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Realgud

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,505
16,960
Yeah. But why? Injured? And poor rehab? Are we not an organisation that can deal with poor patches? Or even poor choices? When the guy in question is a valuable member of our pretty pathetic defence.

And we struggled down the stretch, goes to show his impact.
I highly doubt Walman or Yzerman will go into specifics. And no, we aren't yet an organization that can deal with poor patches. Still very fragile. We ride highs and lows. An emotional bunch that gets down itself relatively easily when things aren't going well. As the core alongside Dylan get older, that should hopefully level out.

I mean... it wasn't a good impact... so...
 

Retire91

Stevey Y you our Guy
May 31, 2010
6,354
1,824
Yeah. But why? Injured? And poor rehab? Are we not an organisation that can deal with poor patches? Or even poor choices? When the guy in question is a valuable member of our pretty pathetic defence.

And we struggled down the stretch, goes to show his impact.

Complete speculation. If I were to take an honest to goodness guess, its feels like involvement with one or more of the other player's girls like back in the day Carter Hartnel, or something personally equivalent like money nightlife drugs theft that are not easily worked through. I mean the level of health care these people have access to is off the charts and that would include mental health with councilors who's whole profession is conflict resolution and organizational psychology. Whatever it was it was felt by the organization it was unworkable.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad