I guess I just don’t get this odd attachment to a guy like Walman around here.
After 12/31 last season, he scored a whopping 4 points and was not good at defense for the remainder of the season. Before this year, he had about 50 career points in just about 200 career games. And on top of that, was apparently a locker room issue AND did a stupid dance that I hate because f*** the Minnesota Vikings!
But now that he’s having an anomaly of a season, people want to use that as an excuse to”ah ha! Gotcha!” moment to criticize Yzerman?
We have enough information about Walman by this point to realize he’s having an outside of the mean season for himself. How many times have we seen this from NHL players where they have an awesome season, maybe 2 if they’re lucky, and then regress back to what they’d always been?
Chiarot, Petry and Holl had no hope of being good this year. None of them can survive on the first pair. None of them can even survive on the second pair. Erik Gustafsson had almost no hope of being good this year. We actively and purposefully chose 4 guys that were obviously going to fail instead of Walman whom could have been good. We chose 4 AHL level defenseman over a guy that was likely to be at least a second pairing player.
Trade Ben Chiarot instead and we're a playoff team right now. Trade Jeff Petry instead and we're a playoff team right now. Trade Justin Holl instead and we're a playoff team right now. That's the problem. It's not that getting rid of Walman is a huge deal. It's that we've gone out of our way at every decision point to assemble the worst group of defenseman that we can. That makes me afraid of what happens in UFA this year when we need a second pair defenseman and we're choosing between Chychrun and some guy named Fat Tony in my beer league. Our history indicates that Fat Tony will get the spot.
Also the idea that this is some "gotcha" benefit of hindsight criticism because of Walman's bounce back is ridiculous. I don't want to criticize Yzerman. I love the man. He is responsible for some of my childhood's best memories. I don't want to point out that he keeps bringing in bad defenseman. I want him to bring in good defenseman. And I saw all of this coming well in advance. Scroll to the first page of this thread. Here's how I reacted the day of to trading Walman:
Yeah based upon on-ice play, this is inexplicable. Even if I tell myself "Yzerman hates Walman and wanted him gone no matter what" there's no way that this makes sense. We should be trading Walman for a 2nd +, not Walman + 2nd for FC if we want to trade him. If we're not about to find out that he's a meth head or a sexual predator, and everyone in the league knows, I have no explanation.
To elaborate further, I don't think the piss poor play of our other defenseman was that unpredictable either.
Here were my reactions from 2022 to signing Chiarot:
"I'm ready to offer a 2023 2nd to get this off the books right now. Absolutely terrible, horrendous, just awful"
"Literally every time I've ever noticed Chiarot he has stood out in a bad way. I wouldn't have signed a 2*2 let alone a 4*4"
"The Lightning are my second team. We used to cheer when Chiarot would step on the ice in the finals because it meant either a shift spent entirely in Montreal's end or a penalty."
I especially like how prescient the "it meant... a shift spent entirely in Montreal's end..." Turned out to be as Ben has lived in our end since arriving on this team.
I'm too lazy but I could do the same for Petry and Holl. The point is that it wasn't hard to see this coming. Walman, Chiarot, Petry and Holl are playing exactly as anyone should have expected them to. That's because Walman is good at hockey. Chiarot, Petry and Holl are bad at hockey. It's really that simple.
I just don't understand how after getting to watch these players as part of our own organization, management gets it wrong when I (and half the people on here) got it right having only taken a cursory glance at these players on visiting teams. Have we fired the pro scouts that are making these choices? I haven't heard that. We need to before we're looking at a 6x6 for Fat Tony