Reddwit
Registered User
- Feb 4, 2016
- 7,801
- 3,549
When do we trade Dylan Larkin and get the hockey equivalent of Jared Goff?
Not exactly a Jared Goff type, but Elias Petterson would be nice.
When do we trade Dylan Larkin and get the hockey equivalent of Jared Goff?
I guess I just don’t get this odd attachment to a guy like Walman around here.
After 12/31 last season, he scored a whopping 4 points and was not good at defense for the remainder of the season. Before this year, he had about 50 career points in just about 200 career games. And on top of that, was apparently a locker room issue AND did a stupid dance that I hate because f*** the Minnesota Vikings!
But now that he’s having an anomaly of a season, people want to use that as an excuse to”ah ha! Gotcha!” moment to criticize Yzerman?
We have enough information about Walman by this point to realize he’s having an outside of the mean season for himself. How many times have we seen this from NHL players where they have an awesome season, maybe 2 if they’re lucky, and then regress back to what they’d always been?
On a completely unrelated note, who was it that signed this shitty locker room cancer to a 3 year $10.2 million deal and then had to gift wrap a 2nd round pick to unload the contract a year later so he could free up the cap space to overpay other shitty free agents? Surely the buffoon who did that deserves criticism.
We all had that crazy ex girlfriend; she acted sweet until she got her hooks in ya then turned into the next psycho on SNAPPED.
Walman, despite his amazing play, has already been healthied on a crappy SJS team. He's a ticking time bomb and Grier knows it.
It only cost a 2nd to cure us of cancer, and now we get to sleep good at night without having to keep one eye open on Crazy Sally. Set your DVR, the next episode of SNAPPED will be in California now.
is that why he's playing him 23 minutes a night?
Yeah thank god these disgusting displays of emotion have been wiped away. Way to go Steve!I often think of last year, the passion and fun they had in some of those games. Walman doing his jig a couple times to magical wins - good thing the locker room has been scrubbed of that cancer so we can enjoy the product on the ice this year.
As far as my opinion, I enjoyed watching Walman generate chances, even when the team was still losing. With his youth there was also hope he would keep getting better and be a big piece of the rebuild. Dumping that and a 2nd for nothing was Pejorative Slured. Since I was already having a lot of issues with Yzerman's moves up to that point, the Walman trade coupled with the Jack Campbell signing, really twisted the knife put me in the 'we need a new GM' camp. I think a lot of the other posters in this thread are probably of a similar mindset.
Wait for the "SNAPPED" part. Don't be fooled by the Ville Leino facade.
Not just Yzerman, seemed he wasn’t competitive enough for some of the guys in the room. When the captain says it publicly it is generally a decent sized issue.I am fine with Walman gone, but can you stop with this Walman being this psycho of a person? He got healthy scratched this season for a simple misunderstanding and he was traded from here for maybe not being as hard a competitor as Steve Yzerman likes. He wasn't traded because he is some mind bending nutbar or something.
My problem with it is that Walman was hurt last year when his play declined. Early in the season and the year before, he was great for us. He had a history of playing well for us and was a reasonable candidate to bounce back. I wasn't hoping we'd get the apparently high quality first pairing defenseman San Jose has. I was hoping we'd get the somewhat risky second pair quality guy that can just barely survive being carried by Seider on the first pair.I guess I just don’t get this odd attachment to a guy like Walman around here.
After 12/31 last season, he scored a whopping 4 points and was not good at defense for the remainder of the season. Before this year, he had about 50 career points in just about 200 career games. And on top of that, was apparently a locker room issue AND did a stupid dance that I hate because f*** the Minnesota Vikings!
But now that he’s having an anomaly of a season, people want to use that as an excuse to”ah ha! Gotcha!” moment to criticize Yzerman?
We have enough information about Walman by this point to realize he’s having an outside of the mean season for himself. How many times have we seen this from NHL players where they have an awesome season, maybe 2 if they’re lucky, and then regress back to what they’d always been?
I guess I just don’t get this odd attachment to a guy like Walman around here.
After 12/31 last season, he scored a whopping 4 points and was not good at defense for the remainder of the season. Before this year, he had about 50 career points in just about 200 career games. And on top of that, was apparently a locker room issue AND did a stupid dance that I hate because f*** the Minnesota Vikings!
But now that he’s having an anomaly of a season, people want to use that as an excuse to”ah ha! Gotcha!” moment to criticize Yzerman?
We have enough information about Walman by this point to realize he’s having an outside of the mean season for himself. How many times have we seen this from NHL players where they have an awesome season, maybe 2 if they’re lucky, and then regress back to what they’d always been?
Chiarot, Petry and Holl had no hope of being good this year. None of them can survive on the first pair. None of them can even survive on the second pair. Erik Gustafsson had almost no hope of being good this year. We actively and purposefully chose 4 guys that were obviously going to fail instead of Walman whom could have been good. We chose 4 AHL level defenseman over a guy that was likely to be at least a second pairing player.
Trade Ben Chiarot instead and we're a playoff team right now. Trade Jeff Petry instead and we're a playoff team right now. Trade Justin Holl instead and we're a playoff team right now. That's the problem. It's not that getting rid of Walman is a huge deal. It's that we've gone out of our way at every decision point to assemble the worst group of defenseman that we can. That makes me afraid of what happens in UFA this year when we need a second pair defenseman and we're choosing between Chychrun and some guy named Fat Tony in my beer league. Our history indicates that Fat Tony will get the spot.
Yeah based upon on-ice play, this is inexplicable. Even if I tell myself "Yzerman hates Walman and wanted him gone no matter what" there's no way that this makes sense. We should be trading Walman for a 2nd +, not Walman + 2nd for FC if we want to trade him. If we're not about to find out that he's a meth head or a sexual predator, and everyone in the league knows, I have no explanation.
The irony of course being the rest of this team appears to be exhibiting minimal effort on an almost nightly basis.Not just Yzerman, seemed he wasn’t competitive enough for some of the guys in the room. When the captain says it publicly it is generally a decent sized issue.
Walman seems to be having his Jensen this is my last chance moment so good on him for getting on track and staying on track thus far this year. If he had bad through these 30 games he would be on his way to being a really good AHL scoring vet Dman.
It really is funny how smearing Walman is the go to here, all at the service of protecting their delusions of how well the beloved player now GM is doing.I am fine with Walman gone, but can you stop with this Walman being this psycho of a person? He got healthy scratched this season for a simple misunderstanding and he was traded from here for maybe not being as hard a competitor as Steve Yzerman likes. He wasn't traded because he is some mind bending nutbar or something.
I am fine with Walman gone, but can you stop with this Walman being this psycho of a person? He got healthy scratched this season for a simple misunderstanding and he was traded from here for maybe not being as hard a competitor as Steve Yzerman likes. He wasn't traded because he is some mind bending nutbar or something.
It really is funny how smearing Walman is the go to here, all at the service of protecting their delusions of how well the beloved player now GM is doing.
And then somehow don't realize that smearing Walman also reflects extremely poorly on that GM's decision making.
I think it was a bad trade and most I have seen here have said that. I just don't really give a shit, and don't think most of us will in 2 years.The locker room cancer who didn’t want to compete that has 20 pts as a dman on another team while this team flounders and they put half ass efforts in almost every game. If Walman was a Locker room cancer than half of these bums earning paychecks and going through the motions are just as bad. Just admit yzerman made a horrible trade and move on, enough of these stupid justifications.
I mean where ever Walman goes he seems to get healthied and eventually not wanted. Hell, Yzerman had to give up a 2nd to rid of him. Walman is on his what.... 3rd NHL team?
I'll give you Yzerman made a mistake signing him, then fixed his mistake by giving up Tampa's 2nd round as a throw in on a trade he won to rid him of that burden and free up cap space. BOOM!
Making minor mistakes as a GM is nothing when you can easily correct it and still come out ahead. Jesse Kisskin is putting up almost a PPG in Liiga and is a PPG in International-Jr. He just turned 19.
Got rid of cancer
Upgraded prospect
mid 2nd rounder = wash.
Are you going to give credit when credit is due?