Confirmed with Link: Walman and a 2nd Round Pick traded to SJ

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
15,160
8,304
Bellingham, WA
Nick Leddy was and is TRASH. It was determined as soon as the trade happened Yzerman FLEECED the Blues. Complete and utter felony robbery.

Don't try to rewrite history, everyone knows Yzerman fleeced them in that trade.

Yeah fleeced. Second, Sunny, and Walman for Leddy. Well, Sunny is gone and it cost a second to get rid of Walman, so in the end, Stevie got nothing for Leddy. Meanwhile, Leddy has been a serviceable d-man for the Blues until he got injured this season.

I still think he should have acquired Graves, and not Leddy to begin with. Cascading effect, we probably wouldn't have Chiarot right now.
 
Last edited:

kliq

Registered User
Dec 17, 2017
2,738
1,332
Yeah fleeced. Second, Sunny, and Walman for Leddy. Well, Sunny is gone and it cost a second to get rid of Walman, so in the end, Stevie got nothing for Leddy. Meanwhile, Leddy has been a serviceable d-man for the Blues until he got injured this season.

I still think he should have acquired Graves, and not Leddy to begin with. Cascading effect, we probably wouldn't have Chiarot right now.
Not that this even necessarily changes anything, but we did flip Sunny for a 4th rounder which turned out to be Larry Keenan. So technically we end up with Keenan from the Leddy trade.
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,764
11,328
Nick Leddy was and is TRASH. It was determined as soon as the trade happened Yzerman FLEECED the Blues. Complete and utter felony robbery.

Don't try to rewrite history, everyone knows Yzerman fleeced them in that trade.

Doesn't matter how Leddy is viewed. He was the piece that made that trade happen, not anything else. I am not the one rewriting history here.
 

14ari13

Registered User
Oct 19, 2006
14,244
1,311
Norway
If you want to talk facts, then you should mention that Walman has never had trade value. Every team that ditch him, ditch him with assets. As I pointed out earlier, look what Blues gave up to get rid of him off the team.

Hell, Grier had to be enticed to take him with a 2nd rounder.



That's his version of the story. He was healthy scratched in Detroit when they needed him most. Coach and management apparently didn't want him. I read speculation the team didn't even want him around. Blues also didn't want him around.

That's not "cope" for getting rid of him... that is the FACTS that he's had no value wherever he goes and is always healthy scratched (I don't know if Blues healthied him), but they certainly wanted him gone, and gave up valuable assets to make it happen.

Review Walman's NHL career timeline. Where there's smoke, there's fire!

Just because he can put up points doesn't mean he gets a free pass. We as fans don't get the privy to know about. We can put together a damaging timeline of his NHL existence. It'll be interesting to see how his SJ career pans out. I'll fo sho be keeping an eye on it.
Why did Yzerman trade for him in the 1st place if he, we and the whole league knew everything about him?
How many teams wanted to get rid of him, 25?
He is a top 10 on points in the league today?

So why is a top 10 defenceman in points in the league valued this little?

Why didn't Yzerman trade him when his value was at his peak?

Walman, Hronek Suter...are doing great with their new teams. Why did Yzerman get rid of them?
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,764
11,328
Why did Yzerman trade for him in the 1st place if he, we and the whole league knew everything about him?
How many teams wanted to get rid of him, 25?
He is a top 10 on points in the league today?

So why is a top 10 defenceman in points in the league valued this little?

Why didn't Yzerman trade him when his value was at his peak?

Walman, Hronek Suter...are doing great with their new teams. Why did Yzerman get rid of them?

Did you see Suter here? He wasn't good at all.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad