AustonsNostrils
Registered User
- Apr 5, 2016
- 7,409
- 2,535
I do not think Kane is the involved party.My guess would be to shore up the defense. Maybe something around Forbort? Not sure how available he would be.
It would be fair to say that they need everything. I'm not kidding about the injuries.
I do. Bobby Mac has confirmed his name was being discussed with Vancouver, and Russo suggested Buffalo and the Wild spoke about Kane, as well. His fate in Buffalo was probably sealed with his Draft Eve tussles with bar patrons, including pulling a woman by the hair. Between his off-ice issues and his relative inability to consistently mesh with Buffalo's top players, I don't think he's long for that organization. Really, I just don't see Buffalo paying to re-sign Kane - or Kane wanting to stay in another small-market hockey fishbowl, for that matter - so might as well get something more than a rental price for him.
As for Buffalo's needs, they need a lot. Some longer term blueline help would be useful, as would a forward who can create offensive chances and/or finish.
What would buffalo want from MTL for Kane?
What would buffalo want from MTL for Kane?
BTW
took me all of 5 minutes of looking around to find that the Buffalo rumours came out about 20 minutes before eklund posted anything
Isn't every team in the NHL in trade talk basically every day? It's worth noting.
Martinez++ for Reinhart
Or
McNabb+ for E. Kane
Martinez++ for Reinhart
Or
McNabb+ for E. Kane
I'm sure teams are often in trade talk
Isn't every team in the NHL in trade talk basically every day? It's worth noting.
1st offer is ludicrous.
2nd offer I'd wait to see what the plus is, but it's not a horrible base for a deal. Kane has been pretty crap so far and in addition to his off ice issues, I'd say his value is pretty low at the moment.