Value of: Vladimir Tarasenko

[Seanaconda]

Can't see why you would add jersey even with their added cap, they need a goalie not more offense.

Imo

 

[Hale The Villain]

Should return a late 1st, but I could see a 2nd + 3rd or 2nd + C prospect

 

[TheNewEra]

There won’t be any retaining on salary if he is moved.

I actually see the Sens retaining unless they end up really liking a player they are offered in return. But I doubt those players would be available at the deadline

 

[Golden_Jet]

Few if any contenders can fit 5 million on their cap sheet this year. So there will have to be retention.

he also has a NTC

 

[Just A Bit Outside]

Tarasenko for Kuzmenko

 

[lakeshirts37]

There won’t be any retaining on salary if he is moved.

Yes there will be

 

[Voight]

he also has a NTC

Which I imagine he won't waive unless its to join playoff contender.

 

[biturbo19]

I'd certainly have interest in adding him to the Canucks down the stretch. But realistically, not sure they can afford to get into the sort of price range it would cost in assets, especially with the max retention it'd probably take to pare that $5M down to $2.5M to make it fit somehow. At max retention, he's probably into that "late 1st + B/C prospect" range, which is a pricey rental for a team that isn't "all in". Even if the NTC picking his spot lowers the price down to a "2nd + B Prospect" it's a fair price, but probably not one Vancouver can afford to give up.


As for the "one-dimensional" thing, i don't know where that really comes from. As long as he's motivated, he's a net positive two-way player. He came up under Hitchcock after all, did he not? Hitch don't suffer players who flake on their own end very well.

 

[Unbiased Fan]

2nd and a prospect you have not heard of that the other teams fans think is pretty OK.

Can you give like 3 or 4 names for reference please kinda curious. Like a Ben Roger?