Bold + why your OPINIOIN and ONLY your op, is wrong.
In order for you to be right on the merit of what you were advancing, the bold ital would have to be the exclusive, or at least dominant consideration, for your argument.
It is not. Krav had a great series then, and has continued to develop into a fine specimen of potentially star level performer, which is why everybody wants him. He still e.g,, has outstanding skating, vision some scoring pop, etc etc.
Your representation erroneously suggests he does not.
Let me give an illustration in parallel which would show where you would be correct.
Roger Maris hit 61 in '61. He was a productive RF, but never had that star level pop before or since.
That is an illustration not living up to a 1x beyond exceptional performance.
In the current situation, Krav has not played with quality linemates, setting aside other issues mgmt chiefly Drury has caused, which could also throw anybody's game off, but we'll let that slide.
If/when Drury capitulates to bern's way of thinking, then we will have an honest answer, one way or the other, as Krav will ACTUALLY be FACTUALLY updated. Again, I want meaningful mins with top line guys, nothing less.
If not and he is traded, fine, as long as the return is acceptable. We are not giving him away.
correct^imundo!
While you and I have a history of both agree/disagree, prob more disagree than agree, that is fine as for the most part it has been civil and with an effort to be mutually respectful.
We agree to disagree. Won't be the first or the last time.
We are not giving him away. He is worth more.
And consider this: if offers for Krav are too low and NY holds him and listens to me and finally puts the kid acceptable mins with first liners who don't go thru the motions, THEN not only might his value go up, if he crushes it --- not impossible with that level of talent --- his value may go up APPRECIABLY.
