That doesn't hold true for Punk, though....but for the most part, I'd agree.
That's probably the only instance. It's weird. That relationship was always toxic for some reason.
Well... now HHH on the Austin podcast kind of hinted towards being against reigns winning the RR. I remember him saying something like "There were different ideas brought to the table but ultimately this is Vince's business and he gets the final say."
The jury sure is out on HHH. I want to give collective credit to NXT. The writers, decisions, etc. are all great. Seldom can you come up with something that isn't a great idea. But HHH can't be given full credit until it starts happening under his watch at the WWE level.
I think Triple H has his ideas for guys he wants to push but recognizes when it's not going well and when to pull back and go a different direction.
NXT, for example. They were pushing Baron Corbin as a babyface and the crowd started to turn on him like the crowd has done Roman. Instead of force him as a babyface, they turned Corbin heel and now he's one of their top guys down there and is a very credible challenger to Balor, and can take the title off Balor and be the top heel down there.
I think Triple H wanted to go a different direction than Roman winning the Rumble after the reactions were clear and WWE had to put The Rock out there to beg the crowd to cheer Roman, which still failed. I think he wanted to go a different direction at Survivor Series (I believe the reports that he wanted Ambrose or Owens to win considering there were reports a week early of "high-level officials" pitching Ambrose win the title) because he knew where the reaction would be with the crowd but his hands are tied when a senile, impatient old man is running the show and calling the shots.
Now, because of his impatient father-in-law, he has to completely re-do The Authority vs. Daniel Bryan storyline, except with a babyface counterpart that the fans don't give a damn about... and he knows this.