Claimed off Waivers: [VGK] Golden Knights re-claim F Raphael Lavoie off waivers from the Oilers - assigned to AHL

Mr Kot

Registered User
Jan 15, 2022
5,560
12,773
I would love the Flames to claim him this time just to troll the Oilers
96ajpy.jpg
 

joestevens29

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
54,061
17,184
That's $9500 a game ish. Are we sure he will play all games?



Seems it wasn't us, but yeah, if you waive him so soon, we're probably taking him after losing Schwindt and Rooney this week.
Get paid everyday that you are on the active NHL roster whether you play or not. Not done by games

Oilers care more about accruing cap space than they do about losing Lavoie.

They don't believe in him.
Lowetide was talking about it on his show. Problem is Lavoie is going to play bottom 6 more than likely 4th line, but he doesn't PK and can't play center.

Think the plan was/is get him in Bakersfield at the very least playing PK so that if he is called up he can bring something to the 4th line.
 

tmg

Registered User
Jul 10, 2003
2,975
1,737
Ottawa
Is there anything stopping this from continuing all season? If Vegas and Edmonton both want him on their AHL team and a third team (say, NYR) wants him in the nhl - what’s stopping it from just being constantly “Edmonton waives, Vegas and NYR claim, Vegas wins, can’t send to minors because there was another claimant, Vegas waives, Edmonton and NYR Claim, Edmonton wins, can’t send to minors because there was another claimant… lather rinse repeat”
 

JoeSakic13

Registered User
May 30, 2013
11,938
22,278
San Francisco
Another team must have put a claim in or Edmonton could've just sent him to the AHL
Yeah that’s what I thought.

So they are hoping the other team doesn’t want him anymore? Or did something come up in the last 24 hours that made Edmonton change their mind all together?
 

Guardian452

Registered User
Jun 10, 2011
1,311
355
Another team must have put a claim in or Edmonton could've just sent him to the AHL
There’s only 1 team with a lower waiver priority than Edmonton and they currently have only 12 forwards on their active roster. It’s a safe bet that Lavoie is off to Florida tomorrow.
 

T_Cage

VP of Awesome
Sep 26, 2006
5,527
888
I guess someone other than Edmonton put in a claim for Lavoie?
Would have to be a case. Shame they couldn't just assign him to the new team if edmonton didn't want to keep him up instead of the perpetual waivers

I forgot kappo signed in winnipeg tbh. Hasn't seemed to make it click in terms of being a full time NHL tender
 

CupInSIX

My cap runneth over
Jul 1, 2012
26,314
18,268
Alphaville
There’s only 1 team with a lower waiver priority than Edmonton and they currently have only 12 forwards on their active roster. It’s a safe bet that Lavoie is off to Florida tomorrow.
If Vegas puts in a claim again, can't they just send him to Henderson? Or does the 3rd team get priority?
 

tmg

Registered User
Jul 10, 2003
2,975
1,737
Ottawa
There’s only 1 team with a lower waiver priority than Edmonton and they currently have only 12 forwards on their active roster. It’s a safe bet that Lavoie is off to Florida tomorrow.

Waiver order (before Nov 1) is just the previous regular season reverse standings order isn’t it? The order doesn’t change with playoff results like the draft order does, as far as I know.

Dallas, Winnipeg, Colorado, Vancouver, Carolina, NYR, Florida, and Boston would all be later in the order than Edmonton if that’s the case.
 

Figgy44

A toast of purple gato for the memories
Dec 15, 2014
13,947
9,280
Get paid everyday that you are on the active NHL roster whether you play or not. Not done by games


Lowetide was talking about it on his show. Problem is Lavoie is going to play bottom 6 more than likely 4th line, but he doesn't PK and can't play center.

Think the plan was/is get him in Bakersfield at the very least playing PK so that if he is called up he can bring something to the 4th line.

Sorry, you're right. I meant every day they're earning the NHL salary, not necessarily games played. I assume the Oilers aren't obligated to keep him on the roster for the entire season if his play doesn't merit keeping him up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joestevens29

mouser

Business of Hockey
Jul 13, 2006
29,610
13,123
South Mountain
Is there a way to know if this team put in a claim when Lavoie was first put in waivers and was beaten out by Vegas?

Whether or not multiple teams submitted a claim rarely becomes public. For your specific question I’d expect the answer is No.

We usually only find out if multiple claims were submitted if that blocks the ability of a team to trade the player or send the player to the AHL after reclaiming off waivers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncleben

Richard88

John 3:16
Jun 29, 2019
19,407
21,158
Yeah that’s what I thought.

So they are hoping the other team doesn’t want him anymore? Or did something come up in the last 24 hours that made Edmonton change their mind all together?
Maybe they just wanted to try to keep him from Vegas (a division rival). Claiming him back kept Lavoie from Vegas's AHL team, and now Edmonton know that Vegas already picked up someone else (Schwindt), and another team put in a claim, so they can be reasonably comfortable that they can waive him and he gets picked up by someone else (eg. Avs). Better a team outside the division have him than a division rival benefitting. Of course Vegas could also claim him back but that seems unlikely now.
 

North

Registered User
Jun 25, 2009
16,190
14,337
Maybe they just wanted to try to keep him from Vegas (a division rival). Claiming him back kept Lavoie from Vegas's AHL team, and now Edmonton know that Vegas already picked up someone else (Schwindt), and another team put in a claim, so they can be reasonably comfortable that they can waive him and he gets picked up by someone else (eg. Avs). Better a team outside the division have him than a division rival benefitting. Of course Vegas could also claim him back but that seems unlikely now.
Apparently if Vegas claims him again they can send him to the AHL.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad