Confirmed Trade: [VGK/CGY/PHI] Noah Hanifin (75% retained), Mikhail Vorobyov to VGK; 2026 1st , 2025 cond. 3rd, Daniil Miromanov to CGY; 2024 5th to PHI
- Thread starter MMC
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Conroy is accomplishing what he set out to do:
Acquire picks while helping all of the Oilers competitors beef up.
He is doing God's work.
Acquire picks while helping all of the Oilers competitors beef up.
He is doing God's work.
hangman005
Have I told you I miss Logan Thompson
Chuck Martinez on LTIR and swoop up all three
hangman005
Have I told you I miss Logan Thompson
Winning another cup would be nice, the problem the players have is all the pesky playoff games getting in the way of their golfing
Breeze 44
Registered User
Volica
Papa Shango
- May 15, 2012
- 21,954
- 11,665
No I don’t think that team will fall off that bad.
But our new arena is done in 2027; rumour is that they want to be competitive by the opening of the new arena. This year they’re meddling, but I honestly think they’re going to start some heavy tanking over the next couple seasons.
Flames Acquire Miromanov, First And Third Round Picks | Calgary Flames
Daniil Miromanov, picks acquired in exchange for Noah Hanifin
www.nhl.com
Couldn't even proofread the conditions? You hope those aren't the ones on the trade papers.
Cause if you read it, although it's near gibberish, there's a big f***ing problem for the Flames.
The first sentence means the Flames get the 2025 if, and only if, the Knights have their 2025 pick on March 10, 2024, AND the pick is not top 10. Alright, fair enough.
The second sentence means the Flames get the 2026, if, and only if, the Knights don't have their 2025 pick.
That means, together, that if the Knights own their pick and it's in the top 10, the Flames get nothing lol.
They clearly f***ed up the language in the second sentence, it doesn't make sense, but if the NHL is a stickler, the Flames could be facing O'Reilly 2.0.
I'm assuming the NHL will fix it, but sucks knowing the Flames need to be babysat like this.
With the players they still have there is no heavy tanking. By 2027, we may/probably have a new arena but the team will be in the same spot as it is in right now.
- Jul 28, 2011
- 17,325
- 12,228
Don't worry. Vegas won't be in the bottom 10 with their 300million cap hit. It's all good.Flames Acquire Miromanov, First And Third Round Picks | Calgary Flames
Daniil Miromanov, picks acquired in exchange for Noah Hanifin
Couldn't even proofread the conditions? You hope those aren't the ones on the trade papers.
Cause if you read it, although it's near gibberish, there's a big f***ing problem for the Flames.
The first sentence means the Flames get the 2025 if, and only if, the Knights have their 2025 pick on March 10, 2024, AND the pick is not top 10. Alright, fair enough.
The second sentence means the Flames get the 2026, if, and only if, the Knights don't have their 2025 pick.
That means, together, that if the Knights own their pick and it's in the top 10, the Flames get nothing lol.
They clearly f***ed up the language in the second sentence, it doesn't make sense, but if the NHL is a stickler, the Flames could be facing O'Reilly 2.0.
I'm assuming the NHL will fix it, but sucks knowing the Flames need to be babysat like this.
joestevens29
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 54,136
- 17,255
I know there are lots of complaints about the LTIR and I for one have always suggested that come playoff time you should only be able to dress 20 players for a cap that have to be under the regular season cap.
However, I did hear that Vegas was cap compliant(based on regular season cap and players dressed) at the very least against Edmonton last year in the playoffs if not the whole playoffs.
However, I did hear that Vegas was cap compliant(based on regular season cap and players dressed) at the very least against Edmonton last year in the playoffs if not the whole playoffs.
TheFinalWord
Registered User
- Apr 25, 2005
- 2,258
- 884
You're reading an article. They're writing it to try and help us pigeons understand.Flames Acquire Miromanov, First And Third Round Picks | Calgary Flames
Daniil Miromanov, picks acquired in exchange for Noah Hanifin
Couldn't even proofread the conditions? You hope those aren't the ones on the trade papers.
Cause if you read it, although it's near gibberish, there's a big f***ing problem for the Flames.
The first sentence means the Flames get the 2025 if, and only if, the Knights have their 2025 pick on March 10, 2024, AND the pick is not top 10. Alright, fair enough.
The second sentence means the Flames get the 2026, if, and only if, the Knights don't have their 2025 pick.
That means, together, that if the Knights own their pick and it's in the top 10, the Flames get nothing lol.
They clearly f***ed up the language in the second sentence, it doesn't make sense, but if the NHL is a stickler, the Flames could be facing O'Reilly 2.0.
I'm assuming the NHL will fix it, but sucks knowing the Flames need to be babysat like this.
An article from NHL.com isn't going to be using words like "convey" to help us understand. It was clearly copied from something, and like I said, I hope that isn't the trade papers lol.
theslatcher
Registered User
hangman005
Have I told you I miss Logan Thompson
We haven't traded for anyone new it like 4 hours, I'm getting the shakes.
joestevens29
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 54,136
- 17,255
theslatcher
Registered User
Looks like you picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue.
Lockin17
Registered User
- Jul 31, 2018
- 3,952
- 3,090
Not too bad for CGY , a first and 2nd and Miromanov a 2nd pick doing really well in the KHL , 1ppg
Menzinger
Kessel4LadyByng
Ted Hoffman
Done
- Dec 15, 2002
- 29,289
- 8,728
I had an example up above where a team is cap compliant as of the end of the regular season, without ever using LTIR, and even has cap dollars left over, but this rule - which you and dozens of others have suggested as a "solution" - would force that team to not use players it permissibly acquired to get under this new, artificial cap.
Not to mention: the in-season cap is based on the Active Roster, which can go to as many as 23 players (and also includes anyone on IR - but IR doesn't exist in the playoffs, because there's no limit on the size of the Active Roster), and suddenly limiting it to "dress 20 players" is much more constraining.
Maybe we could find easier ways to deal with this "problem." Like, say, enforce Article 26 which already provides a means for dealing with this.
Hanifan has been good for the Flames. But you can't blame a guy for choosing somewhere warm to sign his last big contract. I think Conroy's moves have been under rated, he inherited a disaster and has been moving out old UFA's for picks, prospects and young talent. They are set in goal, have a bunch of good young forwards and a bunch of cap space and flexibility the next 2 off seasons.
I don’t know you can call it a fumble. I’m sure they took the best deal available. Teams just aren’t willing to pay much for pending UFAs any more.
SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 15,812
- 15,315
