- Jun 25, 2018
- 1,078
- 2,058
The thing is that by allowing a contact termination where the player still gets paid they're opening a huge new can of worms. Saying it's OK in this case because the player has a way to strong-arm the team into an outcome that the team itself wants... Do you see how that's an issue? Just keep terminating players' contracts while they have a possible grievance.I addressed it in an earlier post. The NHL and Vegas aren't trying to pick a fight with a guy who's gunna cry mental health the first chance he gets
See above
Let's say a team's got a player who'd otherwise spend the rest of his career on LTIR. Assuming the theater is even necessary, what's to stop a player who's too injured to play from saying they're too injured to report for their physical? The team of course terminates his contract for said breach, he says he'll raise a stink if if he's terminated due to a work-related injury, the team says oh no, I guess we've got no choice but to settle and pay your salary after terminating your contract and whaddya know, now we can bank cap space for the trade deadline!
How about a player who's really under-performing his contract. The team tells him partway through the season that they might have to consider buying him out this offseason if he doesn't improve, which is gonna mean he loses a chunk of the remaining salary coming to him on his contract. They suggest he goes to see a sports psychologist and he gets diagnosed with anxiety, depression, what have you. His play doesn't improve, so they suggest he fails to show up for his physical, and the Lehner situation repeats and the team's manufactured a free buyout. Is the NHL gonna get involved in investigating which cases of mental illness are severe enough for the Lehner-termination and which aren't?
My point is, this loophole seems incredibly easy to abuse since both the player and the team have an incentive to do it. If they don't provide a very clear explanation of how the Lehner situation happened and why it had to be resolved in such a unique way that happens to benefit both parties.
To my mind, the easiest way to handle this would've been to say if a player has documented mental health issues and claims they prevent him from appearing for his physical, that qualifies him for LTIR. That would acknowledge that mental illness is a real illness rather than some weird other category that gets its own unique treatment.