Start here:
Just in 5 minutes:
* Teams have to declare a playing roster that is cap-compliant in [unspecified] fashion. Doesn't account for injuries, both ones that occur and ones where a player finally heals up and is ready to play - and the NHLPA isn't about to have players prohibited from playing in the playoffs simply because they had the bad luck of not getting healthy until a certain point.
* Players who are on LTIR can't play until _______. See point above about the NHLPA.
* Teams can exceed the cap, but only by _______. Doesn't fix the "problem" of players getting healthy in time for the playoffs, which is what people here are bitching about.
* Well, we'll set every team's cap based on the sum of the cap hits they had at the deadline. You've just incentivized teams who splurge at the deadline and penalized teams who don't. Also known as: you've rewarded high-revenue teams and penalized low-revenue teams.
* Teams can have all the cap hits they want on the roster, but they can only play guys whose cap hits ..... - see the point about teams being able to acquire players at the deadline because of accrued cap space, then put that against the immediately preceding point.
And every single one of you who keeps complaining about taxes and the salary cap and wants some adjustment made for it: stop it. I and others have shot down this TEAMS IN NO INCOME TAX STATES HAVE TEH MASSIVE ADVANTAGE argument numerous times already, this "problem" is purely an imaginary one that doesn't appear in any other professional sport where the "advantage" is very clearly and very obviously due to "no income tax" like is repeatedly alleged with the NHL. Until/unless you're willing to agree to have a salary cap that is "fair" by accounting for every possible advantage any one market may have over another, all you're doing is imposing some artificial notion of what's supposed to be fair while agreeing that some teams can be penalized for economic disadvantages as long as it doesn't disadvantage your team.